When do we…
When is a DORA readiness gap blocking, and who must hear about it?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Treat a gap as blocking when a duty that binds your entity type is rated Not started or Planned. Enter it as Priority 1 on the day you find it, and take it to the management body at its next meeting; where that is more than 10 working days away, the DORA programme lead tells the chair within that time.
- Reasoning
- A binding duty below In place is not in place at all, and one blocking gap makes the readiness result Not ready (DR-05). A binding duty that is in place but not operating is Priority 2, because a request for evidence of implementation would find it incomplete. Any other item below Operating is Priority 3. Every gap has an owner, an effort and a due date (DR-06). The pack's rule also sends any other gap rated Priority 1, such as a test finding, by the same route, whatever its source. A person other than the one who fixed a weakness confirms it is fully addressed (DR-14).
- Considerations
- The 30, 90 and 180 days and the 10 working days are the pack's defaults. Change them only if your own standard sets different ones, and keep them at least as strict.
- Which items bind you comes from your approved scope assessment; counsel confirms it. Not applicable is never chosen because a duty is hard or costly (DR-03). This is not legal advice.
- The pack names no duty to tell the supervisor about a readiness gap. If you are not sure whether your authority or national law requires it, ask counsel before the next report to the authority (DR-21).
- The pack defines the management body as the body that effectively runs the entity or has key functions under its governing law, such as the board. Confirm with counsel which body and chair your law means.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 17 steps.
Start
An item is rated below Operating, or a test finds a weakness
Operating means working in full and meeting its own target, with records a supervisor could sample. Below that are In place (documented and working, but incomplete, short of target or thin on records), Planned (owner and approach agreed) and Not started. When in doubt, choose the lower level. Every item below Operating, and every test finding, is a gap.
In the pack
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentInstructions
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
Decision
Does the duty apply to you at all?
Not applicable is for a duty that does not apply to your profile, with the reason recorded and confirmed with counsel. It is never chosen because the duty is hard or costly (DR-03). If you are not sure, treat the duty as applying (judgement).
- No, with the reason: Not applicable: record why, and have counsel confirm
- Yes, or not sure: Does the gap come from the readiness self-assessment?
In the pack
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerInstructions (rule DR-03)
Outcome
Not applicable: record why, and have counsel confirm
It is not a gap and counts neither for nor against the result. Reviewing the reason whenever you review the scope assessment is a judgement, because a change in your type, size or TLPT identification can make the duty apply (DR-01). An organisation that only supplies ICT services to a financial entity does not run the readiness assessment (DR-22).
In the pack
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentInstructions (rule DR-22)
Decision
Does the gap come from the readiness self-assessment?
A self-assessment gap takes its priority from the item's level. A weakness found by a test, an audit, a post-incident review or a supervisor goes in the same tracker with a different source, and you choose its priority from the description that fits. Every test finding goes in the tracker with an owner, a priority and a due date.
- Yes: self-assessment: Is the item binding on your entity type?
- No: test, audit or other finding: Is a duty that binds you not in place at all?
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-14)
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerGaps
Decision
Is a duty that binds you not in place at all?
The description of Priority 1 is a duty that binds the entity and is not in place at all. If the finding fits it, choose Priority 1. If you are not sure, choose it. The pack's rule sends any gap rated Priority 1, whatever its source, by the same route to the management body as a blocking gap.
- Yes, or not sure: Blocking gap: Priority 1, in the tracker today, close in 30 days
- No: Choose Priority 2 or 3 by the description that fits
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerSummary
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerInstructions (rule DR-05)
Step
Choose Priority 2 or 3 by the description that fits
Priority 2 is a binding duty that is in place but not operating, so that a request for evidence of implementation would find it incomplete. Priority 3 is any other item. Give the finding one owner and a due date. A person other than the one who fixed the weakness confirms that it is fully addressed before it is Done.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-14)
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerDefinitions
Decision
Is the item binding on your entity type?
An item is binding when at least one of its requirements applies to your profile and is a duty, not an option. In the pack's example the information-sharing item is not binding, because taking part is optional, and neither is the item for evidence ready for the authority. Items you add for national law count as binding duties. If you are not sure, treat it as binding (judgement).
- Yes, or not sure: Is it rated Not started or Planned?
- No: Priority 3: improvement, close within 180 days
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerReadiness Items
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
Decision
Is it rated Not started or Planned?
A binding item below In place is a blocking gap, because the duty is not in place at all. A binding item that is In place is not blocking, although a request for evidence of implementation would find it incomplete. If you cannot show that it is in place, rate it lower.
- Yes, or not sure: Blocking gap: Priority 1, in the tracker today, close in 30 days
- No: it is In place: Priority 2: exposed on request, close within 90 days
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-05)
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
Step
Blocking gap: Priority 1, in the tracker today, close in 30 days
Enter it in the gap tracker as Priority 1 on the day it is found. One blocking gap makes the whole result Not ready. The pack's default is to close it within 30 days of the assessment, or by an earlier date a plan already set. Give it one owner, an effort and the change that closes it. Incident decisions and clocks stay with P09 and P18.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-05)
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentResults
Decision
Does the management body meet within 10 working days?
The pack counts Monday to Friday, and leaves public holidays for you to allow for. The pack defines the management body as the body that effectively runs the entity or has key functions under the law that governs it, such as the board. Confirm with counsel which body and which chair your law means. The 10 working days is the pack's default. If no meeting date is set, take the no branch (judgement).
- Yes: Take it to the management body at that meeting
- No, or no date set: The DORA programme lead tells the chair within 10 working days
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerSummary (rule DR-05)
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentResults
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
Step
Take it to the management body at that meeting
Put it on the agenda with its owner, due date and the decision you need. In the pack's example the two blocking gaps need a contract amendment signed (GAP-07) and an exit plan written, approved and tested (GAP-08). The Summary sheet has a place to record who reported to the body and when.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerSummary
- P21-A10 Management Body DORA Briefing Deck
Step
The DORA programme lead tells the chair within 10 working days
Where the next meeting is more than 10 working days away, the DORA programme lead tells the chair within that time. What to give the chair is a judgement: the gap, its owner, its due date and the decision needed. In the pack's example, an assessment on 30 September 2026 and a board meeting on 22 October 2026, 16 working days later, send the gap to the chair by 14 October 2026. The gap still goes to the management body at its next meeting.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerSummary (rule DR-05)
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentResults
Outcome
Take counsel's advice before the next report to the authority
Ask counsel, and your authority where appropriate, whether the gap must be notified and by when. Record the answer with the gap. Do not restate or invent a reporting clock: P18 holds the DORA reporting duties and P09 the decision rights.
In the pack
- P21-A08 DORA Documentation & Evidence ChecklistInstructions (rule DR-21)
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerInstructions (rule DR-15)
Step
Priority 2: exposed on request, close within 90 days
The duty is in place but not operating, so a request for evidence of implementation would find it incomplete. The pack's default is to close it within 90 days of the assessment, or by an earlier planned date. Give it one owner, an effort and the change that closes it.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-06)
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerDefinitions
Step
Priority 3: improvement, close within 180 days
Any other item below Operating. The pack's default is to close it within 180 days of the assessment, or by an earlier planned date. It is not a blocking gap. A result of Ready, with actions needs no blocking gap anywhere in the assessment.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-06)
- P21-A04 DORA Readiness Self-AssessmentDefinitions
Outcome
Report the counts to the management body with each assessment
Report open gaps by priority, with those past their due date named, together with the readiness counts. Do this each time you assess, at least every 6 months by the pack's default, and on the interval your reporting calendar sets. Counts with names only, never a score. Dropping a gap needs the management body's recorded reason.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerHeadline Counts (rule DM-06)
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerPriorities (rule DR-04)
Practical checklist
- Rate each item at the self-assessment, choosing the lower level when in doubt.
- Mark Not applicable only where your profile removes the duty, with the reason confirmed by counsel.
- Check whether the item is binding on your entity type, treating it as binding if unsure.
- Enter a binding item rated Not started or Planned as Priority 1 on the day it is found, with one owner, an effort and the change that closes it.
- Give a test or audit finding the priority whose description fits, and route a Priority 1 finding the same way.
- Take the gap to the next management body meeting, or have the DORA programme lead tell the chair within 10 working days.
- Ask counsel whether your authority or national law requires notification, and record the answer.
- Report open gaps by priority and the readiness counts to the management body with each assessment.
Evidence to have ready
- The readiness self-assessment, with each item's level and the evidence behind it.
- The gap tracker: source, priority, owner, effort, due date and the change that closes each gap.
- The record of who reported each Priority 1 gap to the management body or its chair, and when.
- Counsel's view on any notification to the authority, recorded with the gap.
- The counts reported to the management body, and its recorded reason for any gap withdrawn.
Assumptions
- You are a financial entity that DORA binds, and you have rated each readiness item at a self-assessment as Not started, Planned, In place, Operating or Not applicable.
- The 30, 90 and 180 days and the 10 working days are the CISO Times DORA pack's defaults. The pack lets you change the days only if your own standard sets different ones, and asks you to keep them at least as strict.
- Which items bind you comes from your approved scope assessment, because the framework, microenterprise status and TLPT identification change it. Counsel confirms it. This is not legal advice.
- The DORA programme lead is the pack's role for telling the chair. Your own title may differ.
Not covered here
- How to prepare the records a supervisor may ask for. That is “How do we get ready for a supervisor's request for DORA evidence?”.
- How to show the management body approved and oversees the framework. That is “How do we show our management body has approved and oversees our ICT risk management framework?”.
- Whether you are a financial entity at all. That is “Is our organisation a financial entity under DORA, and which duties follow?”.
- Deciding whether an ICT incident is major, and whom to notify and when. That is “How do we decide whether an ICT incident is major under DORA?” for whether it is major, and “When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?” for the regime and clock.
Related questions
- How do we get ready for a supervisor's request for DORA evidence?
- How do we show our management body has approved and oversees our ICT risk management framework?
- Is our organisation a financial entity under DORA, and which duties follow?
- When do we tell the board about bad news between meetings?
- How do we decide whether an ICT incident is major under DORA?