How do we…
How do we decide whether an ICT incident is major under DORA?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Classify an incident as major when critical services are affected and either a malicious unauthorised access that may result in data losses has occurred or at least two other thresholds are met. Classify as soon as the facts allow and record the time, because the initial notification clock runs from it.
- Reasoning
- Critical services affected is always required; without it nothing is major. With it, the malicious access is enough alone, and any other threshold needs a second. The initial notification is due within 4 hours of classifying and no later than 24 hours after awareness. Where the incident is classified as major more than 24 hours after awareness, it is due within 4 hours of that classification. Figures you cannot yet count are estimated from comparable periods.
- Considerations
- The thresholds are the pack's summary of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772. Apply the Regulation's own text and your authority's guidance, and confirm your reading with counsel.
- Incidents that are not major alone are one major incident where they occurred at least twice within 6 months, share an apparent root cause and together meet the test. This does not apply to microenterprises or to the entities DORA Article 16(1) lists.
- If later facts show a reported incident never met the test, notify the reclassification as non-major on the template. Never stop reporting silently.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
- Loop back
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 20 steps.
Start
An ICT-related incident has been declared
DORA's major-incident test comes from Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772. It has one mandatory criterion, critical services, and a set of materiality thresholds. Every declared incident gets a recorded DORA decision, whether or not a report follows, within 4 hours of declaration in the pack's default.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe criteria
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-01 Screen and decide (rule RN-02)
Step
Fix the awareness time: the 24-hour limit runs from it
Awareness is the time the incident was declared, or earlier where the record shows reasonable certainty earlier. The initial notification has two limits and the earlier wins: 4 hours from classifying the incident as major, and 24 hours from awareness. The 24-hour limit runs whether or not you have classified yet.
In the pack
- P18-A02 EU Incident Notification Timeline Matrix (NIS2, DORA, GDPR)Clock Rules (rules CN-01, CN-04)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWhere the doubt point falls
Decision
Does our applicability profile say DORA applies to us?
DORA's reporting duties fall on financial entities. Settle that once, before any incident, in a profile your executive management approves, with the competent authority and its channel. If it is unclear, run the test anyway and settle scope with counsel.
- Yes, or not known: Gather the figures; estimate what cannot yet be counted
- No: Record DORA as Not applicable, citing the profile
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe applicability profile (rule RN-01)
Outcome
Record DORA as Not applicable, citing the profile
One line in your notification log, with the profile as the reason, as the pack's example distributor does for every incident because it is not a financial entity. NIS2 and the GDPR are still tested on their own terms.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe four outcomes
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe EXAMPLE profile
Step
Gather the figures; estimate what cannot yet be counted
Put the facts in the one record every report is drafted from: services and functions affected, clients, counterparts and transactions, duration and downtime, Member States, data affected, costs. Figures that cannot yet be counted are estimated from comparable periods. Duration runs from when the incident occurred or was detected; downtime from when the service became unavailable.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe criteria
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureWhy one fact base (rule RN-11)
Decision
Has it affected critical services?
Always required. Yes when the incident affects ICT services or systems that support critical or important functions, or financial services that need authorisation, registration or supervision, or when it is a successful, malicious and unauthorised access to your network and information systems. Without this, nothing is major however many thresholds are met.
- Yes, or not known: Was there a malicious, unauthorised access that may lose data?
- No: Record Not reportable, with each criterion met or not
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe criteria (rule DC-01)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe rule in words
Decision
Was there a malicious, unauthorised access that may lose data?
A successful, malicious and unauthorised access to network and information systems that may result in data losses. With critical services affected, this alone makes the incident major. If you cannot yet tell, carry it as unknown and count the other thresholds.
- Yes: Classify it as major, and record the time and criteria met
- No, or not known: How many of the other six thresholds are met?
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe criteria (rule DC-02)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelTest cases
Decision
How many of the other six thresholds are met?
Clients, counterparts or transactions (for example more than 10% of the service's clients, or more than 100,000); reputational impact; duration over 24 hours, or a service supporting critical functions down over 2 hours; impact in two or more Member States; data losses that harm business objectives or compliance; costs and losses over 100,000 euro. Data losses alone is one threshold, not enough.
- Two or more: Is it confirmed that critical services are affected?
- Fewer than two so far: Could a fact we do not yet know make it major?
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe criteria (rule DC-03 to DC-08)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelTest cases
Decision
Could a fact we do not yet know make it major?
If a missing figure or an unconfirmed access could still tip the count, the decision cannot be settled yet. Do not record Not reportable to fill the gap. If no unknown could change the result, it is not major on the facts known.
- Yes, or not sure: Record Not settled, with a revisit time before the doubt point
- No: Record Not reportable, with each criterion met or not
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelEach step's question and where the answer leads (rule DS-03)
Outcome
Record Not settled, with a revisit time before the doubt point
Record the missing fact, who is finding it out, and when you will decide again. If it is still not settled 6 hours before the initial notification deadline, the pack's default, treat it as major and report on the facts known. Brief whoever submits reports now.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWhen a decision cannot be settled (rule RN-04)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-02 Brief the signatory
Decision
Is it confirmed that critical services are affected?
Two thresholds make the incident major only with critical services affected. If that is still unknown, the decision turns on it and is Not settled, not Reportable. A malicious unauthorised access counts as affecting critical services by itself, so that route does not need this check.
- Yes: Classify it as major, and record the time and criteria met
- Not yet known: Record Not settled, with a revisit time before the doubt point
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe rule in words
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelEach step's question and where the answer leads (rule DS-03)
Step
Classify it as major, and record the time and criteria met
The executive incident lead decides to report and records which criteria were met and on what facts. The classification time matters: the 4-hour limit for the initial notification runs from it. If you classify more than 24 hours after awareness, the notification is due 4 hours after classification.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWho decides (rule RN-06)
- P18-A02 EU Incident Notification Timeline Matrix (NIS2, DORA, GDPR)Clock Rules (rule CN-10)
Step
Send the initial notification on the authority's template
Use the template of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/302 through your competent authority's channel. An intermediate report follows within 72 hours of the initial notification and again when regular activities are recovered; the final report within one month of the latest intermediate report. Tell clients whose financial interests are affected without undue delay.
In the pack
- P18-A02 EU Incident Notification Timeline Matrix (NIS2, DORA, GDPR)Timeline Matrix (rule RD-10 to RD-13)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureDORA
Decision
Do later facts show it never met the major test?
Ask at every update. New facts can show the first classification was wrong. A change from major to non-major is reported to the authority on the template; it is never made by simply stopping the reports.
- Yes: Notify the reclassification as non-major; never stop silently
- No: Keep reporting: intermediate, then final, each on its clock
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelReclassification
Outcome
Notify the reclassification as non-major; never stop silently
Notify the authority on the template that the incident is reclassified as non-major, with the facts that changed. Record it as a new decision line, Not reportable, that replaces the Reportable one. The first line stays in the log.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelReclassification
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureCorrections (rule RN-12)
Outcome
Keep reporting: intermediate, then final, each on its clock
Each submission sets the next due time in the log and in the calendars of the drafter and whoever submits. The final report's clock restarts with each intermediate report. If a time limit cannot be met, tell the authority before it passes and say why.
In the pack
- P18-A02 EU Incident Notification Timeline Matrix (NIS2, DORA, GDPR)Clock Rules (rule CN-05)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureLate reports (rules RN-10, RN-13)
Step
Record Not reportable, with each criterion met or not
Name the criteria met and not met, and the facts behind each. If the incident is Severity 1 or 2 when the decision is recorded, the executive incident lead decides not to report; at Severity 3 or 4 the incident manager may record it.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe decision record
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWho decides (rule RN-06)
Decision
At the next update, has a fact changed?
A decision not to report is revisited at every incident update and at once when a fact changes, and the result is recorded even when unchanged. A new figure can meet a threshold days later; classify then, and the 4-hour limit runs from that classification.
- Yes: test again: Has it affected critical services? (back to an earlier step)
- No: At the monthly check, are same-cause incidents major together?
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelRevisiting a decision (rule RN-05)
Decision
At the monthly check, are same-cause incidents major together?
Incidents that are not major one by one are one major incident where they occurred at least twice within 6 months, share the same apparent root cause, and together meet the test. Check every month. This does not apply to microenterprises or to the financial entities DORA Article 16(1) lists.
- Yes: Classify it as major, and record the time and criteria met
- No: Not major: keep the record, revisit, and check recurrence monthly
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelRecurring incidents
Outcome
Not major: keep the record, revisit, and check recurrence monthly
The decision line, the facts as they stood and every revisit are your answer if the authority later asks why it was not told. Keep it in view at each monthly recurrence check, because incidents with the same root cause within 6 months are tested together.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelEvidence to have ready
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelRecurring incidents
Practical checklist
- Confirm from the applicability profile that DORA applies, and which authority and channel receive reports.
- Fix the awareness time: the 24-hour limit runs from it whether or not you have classified.
- Gather the figures in one fact base, estimating what cannot yet be counted from comparable periods.
- Test critical services first, then malicious access, then count the other thresholds.
- Record Not settled with a revisit time where an unknown could tip the result, and treat it as major 6 hours before the deadline.
- Record the classification time and the criteria met, and send the initial notification on the authority's template.
- Revisit every decision at each update, and check monthly for same-cause incidents that are major together.
Evidence to have ready
- The classification time beside the awareness time, and the initial notification's submission time.
- The decision line: each criterion met or not, the facts and estimates behind it, who decided and when.
- The fact base as it stood at the decision, and every revisit with its result.
- The monthly recurrence checks, and any reclassification notice with the facts that changed.
Assumptions
- You are a financial entity under DORA, and a profile approved before any incident says so and names your financial competent authority and its reporting channel.
- You know which of your functions are critical or important and which ICT services support them, because the first test depends on it.
- The thresholds here are the pack's summary of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772. The Regulation's own text, and your authority's guidance, are what you apply; confirm your reading with counsel.
Not covered here
- Whether DORA, NIS2 or the GDPR applies to you at all. That is “When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?”.
- What to do when a fact the test needs is missing and the deadline is close. That is “If we can't tell whether an incident is reportable and the deadline is close, then what?”.
- A significant cyber threat that has not yet caused an incident. DORA lets you notify one voluntarily; the pack's Reportability Decision Model sets out the test.
- Which clock runs first when NIS2 or the GDPR also apply. That is “When one incident triggers NIS2, DORA and GDPR at once, which clock runs first?”.
Related questions
- When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?
- When one incident triggers NIS2, DORA and GDPR at once, which clock runs first?
- How do we decide whether an incident is significant under NIS2?
- If we can't tell whether an incident is reportable and the deadline is close, then what?
- Who approves and submits a regulatory notification, including out of hours?