How do we…
How do we write a NIS2 early warning when we still know very little?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Send the early warning within 24 hours of awareness with what you know, without waiting for the cause. Answer whether an unlawful or malicious act is suspected and whether there could be a cross-border impact, and write "not yet known" wherever you do not know.
- Reasoning
- The early warning is short on purpose. The cause belongs in the final report, and a short early warning on time is worth more than a full one late. The clock runs from awareness on calendar hours, and it does not wait for the decision to report. The CSIRT replies with initial feedback and gives advice on request, so naming what is unknown and what help you want is useful. Drafting from one fact base keeps it consistent with every later report.
- Considerations
- In the pack the incident manager drafts, Legal reviews within 60 minutes, the executive incident lead approves in writing, and a named notification signatory submits. The times are the pack's defaults.
- If the decision to report is still not settled 6 hours before the deadline, the pack's default, the early warning goes on the facts known.
- Where at least 60 minutes remain, a second person checks the approved text against the fact base. With less, it goes without the check and the log says why.
- A report that will miss its deadline still goes as soon as possible, with the reasons for the delay.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
- Loop back
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 20 steps.
Start
A significant incident is under way, and the facts are thin
The early warning is the first of NIS2's reports to the CSIRT or competent authority. It is short on purpose. A common mistake is waiting for the cause before sending it. The cause belongs in the final report. A short early warning on time is worth more than a full one late.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesEarly warning
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedurePitfalls (rule PF-01)
Step
Fix the deadline: 24 hours from awareness
Awareness is the time the incident was declared, from the case log, unless the record shows reasonable certainty earlier. The clock does not wait for the decision to report. It runs on calendar hours, through nights and weekends. Where national law sets a shorter clock, use that. If the incident only becomes reportable later, the clock starts when the record shows the deciding fact was known.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesThe clocks (rules CN-01, CN-02, CN-08)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureWorking out of hours
Decision
Is the NIS2 decision recorded as reportable?
The executive incident lead decides whether to report, on the incident manager's screen, within 4 hours of declaration in the pack's default. The decision is Reportable, Not reportable, or Not settled when a fact the test needs is still unknown. A Not settled decision always carries the time it will be revisited.
- Yes, reportable: Call the signatory on duty and open the fact base
- Not settled yet: Are we within 6 hours of the deadline?
- No, not reportable: No early warning; revisit the decision at every update
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-01 Screen and decide (rule RN-02)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureWho decides (rule RN-06)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelThe four outcomes
Outcome
No early warning; revisit the decision at every update
Record the reasons and the facts relied on. A decision not to report is revisited at each incident update and at once when a fact changes, and the result is recorded even when unchanged. If the incident becomes reportable later, its clock starts when the record shows the deciding fact was known.
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelRevisiting a decision (rule RN-05)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedurePitfalls (rule PF-06)
Decision
Are we within 6 hours of the deadline?
The pack sets a doubt point 6 hours before the first deadline: 18 hours after awareness for the early warning. From then, an unsettled decision is treated as reportable and the report goes on the facts known, saying the assessment continues. A report can be updated or withdrawn. A missed deadline cannot be undone.
- Yes, or not known: treat as reportable: Call the signatory on duty and open the fact base
- No: Set the revisit time, and start drafting anyway
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWhen a decision cannot be settled (rule RN-04)
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWhere the doubt point falls
Step
Set the revisit time, and start drafting anyway
Record the decision as Not settled, with the time it will be revisited, never later than the doubt point. The pack has the signatory briefed for a Not settled decision as for a Reportable one. Starting the draft now is a sensible precaution, so that it is ready if the decision settles as reportable or the doubt point arrives first.
- Then: Is the NIS2 decision recorded as reportable? (back to an earlier step)
In the pack
- P18-A03 Reportability Decision ModelWhen a decision cannot be settled (rule RN-04)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-02 Brief the signatory
Step
Call the signatory on duty and open the fact base
Call the notification signatory on duty, since a message alone is not enough out of hours, and give the due time from the log. The signatory checks at once that they can sign in to the channel; if not, the deputy takes over now. Open the fact base: the one record every report is drafted from, kept by the incident manager, with unknowns written as unknown and estimates marked.
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-02 Brief the signatory
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureWhy one fact base (rule RN-11)
Step
Fill the header: who we are, and who to call now
The entity's name and identifier exactly as the authority holds them from registration, and the sector and services, ideally filled in before any incident. A contact who can answer tonight and at the weekend, usually the incident manager, and a deputy. If the incident manager cannot be reached, name the deputy. Our case number; the authority's reference is "none yet".
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesHeader block
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesHeader guidance
Step
Say what has happened, in two to five sentences of fact
What was seen, which systems or sites, what the attacker or fault has done, and what has been done to stop it. Facts, not theories. Write for an analyst who has never heard of you. Where little is known, say what is known and that the assessment continues.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesField guidance (rule FB-03)
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesEarly warning, 12 Aug 2026
Step
Give the key times; awareness is always known
Detection, awareness and, once reached, containment. When the incident started is often unknown: write "not yet known". The awareness time is never unknown, because it is in the case log.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesField guidance (rule FB-04)
Step
Answer both questions: malicious act, cross-border impact
Is an unlawful or malicious act suspected? Answer Yes, No or Not yet known, with the one fact behind it, such as a ransom note or an attacker's sign-in, and say whether a crime report has been or will be made. Never guess who the attacker is. Could there be a cross-border impact? Name the Member States, or write "not yet known" and what you are checking. A Yes can become a No in the next report.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesField guidance (rules FB-09, FB-07)
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesEarly warning
Step
List what is not yet known, and ask the CSIRT for help
Name the open questions and the report each will follow in, so the authority knows what is coming and need not ask. In the pack's worked example: how the attacker got in, whether data was taken, and the indicators of compromise. The CSIRT replies to an early warning with initial feedback and gives advice on request. Ask for what would help, such as malware analysis, or write "none at present".
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesField guidance
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesChecks before any report goes (rule PF-01)
Decision
Can it go before the 24-hour deadline?
Look at the time left against the steps still to come: review, approval, an optional second check and submission. If the deadline cannot be met, waiting does not help.
- Yes: Has Legal reviewed it within 60 minutes?
- No: Give the reasons for the delay, and tell the lead at once
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesWhen the decision is late, or the deadline will be missed (rule RN-13)
Step
Give the reasons for the delay, and tell the lead at once
A report that will miss its deadline is still made as soon as possible, and says why it is late in one or two plain sentences. It is never held back to avoid a deadline. Tell the executive incident lead about the missed deadline at once. It still goes through review, approval and a signatory, with no time lost waiting.
In the pack
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesWhen the decision is late, or the deadline will be missed (rule RN-13)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureLate reports
Decision
Has Legal reviewed it within 60 minutes?
Legal checks that every fact is in the fact base, that unknowns and estimates are marked, and that the draft says no more than it needs about cause or fault. Legal does not rewrite facts or hold a report. The time-box is 60 minutes in the pack's default, from when the draft is sent, by night as by day.
- Yes: The executive incident lead approves it in writing
- No, the time ran out: Go on the approver's decision, and log the lapse
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureLegal review: the time-box (rule RN-07)
Step
Go on the approver's decision, and log the lapse
When the time-box runs out, the draft goes to the approver without a review, and the log records that the review lapsed. A legal review running past the deadline is one of the pack's named pitfalls.
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureLegal review: the time-box (rule RN-07)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedurePitfalls (rule PF-03)
Step
The executive incident lead approves it in writing
The pack's approver for NIS2 report content is the executive incident lead. Approval is in writing with its time, by email or in the case channel. Out of hours, a phone approval is written into the log by the incident manager and confirmed in writing afterwards. If the approver cannot be reached, their named deputy approves.
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureApproval and the four-eyes check (rule RN-08)
- P09-A10 Incident Communications Template SetCT-06 NIS2 early warning and notification content
Decision
Are at least 60 minutes left before the deadline?
The pack asks for a second check where at least 60 minutes remain before the deadline, its default. With less time left, the signatory submits without it and logs that it was skipped and why.
- Yes: A second person checks it against the fact base
- No: skip it, and log why: Submitted by a signatory, logged, next deadline set
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-06 The four-eyes check and submission (rule RN-08)
Step
A second person checks it against the fact base
Someone other than the drafter compares the approved text with the fact base line by line: times, numbers, names and systems. Check too that nothing in it contradicts a notice already sent to customers.
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureNP-06 The four-eyes check and submission
- P18-A05 NIS2 Early Warning, Notification & Final Report TemplatesChecks before any report goes (rules RN-11, RN-14)
Outcome
Submitted by a signatory, logged, next deadline set
The signatory copies the content into the authority's portal and submits it under their own account. They log the time, channel, a copy of what was sent and the authority's reference; every later report quotes it. They set the incident notification's due time, 72 hours from awareness, in the log and two calendars. Log the CSIRT's feedback and act on it.
In the pack
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureSubmission and the log (rules RN-09, RN-10)
- P18-A04 Regulatory Notification Operating ProcedureINC-2026-014: three NIS2 reports
Practical checklist
- Fix the deadline at 24 hours from awareness, or a shorter national clock where one applies.
- Call the signatory on duty, confirm they can sign in, and open the fact base.
- Fill the header: the entity as registered, a contact reachable at any hour with a deputy, and your case number.
- Write two to five sentences of fact on what has happened, and give the key times.
- Answer both questions, malicious act and cross-border impact, with Yes, No or Not yet known.
- List what is not yet known and any help you want from the CSIRT.
- Get Legal's review within the time-box and the approver's written approval, then a second check if time allows.
- Submit, log the time, channel, copy and reference, and set the incident notification's due time at 72 hours from awareness.
Evidence to have ready
- The awareness time from the case log and the deadline worked out from it.
- A copy of the early warning exactly as sent, with its submission time, channel and the authority's reference.
- Legal's review time, or that it lapsed, and the approver's written approval with its time.
- Whether the second check was done, or why it was skipped.
- The CSIRT's feedback and what was done with it.
Assumptions
- You are an essential or important entity under NIS2, and the incident has been, or is being, tested for significance.
- You have named your CSIRT or competent authority, its channel, and notification signatories with deputies who can sign in to it. The pack leaves these as placeholders because national law decides them.
- The 60-minute legal review, the 6-hour doubt point and the 60-minute threshold for a second check are the pack's defaults, and your own procedure may set others. National law may shorten a clock or add fields. This is not legal advice: confirm your approach with counsel.
Not covered here
- Whether the incident is significant under NIS2 at all. That is “How do we decide whether an incident is significant under NIS2?”.
- What to do when you cannot tell whether an incident is reportable and the deadline is close. That is “If we can't tell whether an incident is reportable and the deadline is close, then what?”.
- Which clock runs first when the GDPR or DORA apply to the same incident. That is “When one incident triggers NIS2, DORA and GDPR at once, which clock runs first?”. The incident notification and final report have their own templates in the pack.
- Who approves and submits reports out of hours, and their deputies. That is “Who approves and submits a regulatory notification, including out of hours?”.
Related questions
- When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?
- When one incident triggers NIS2, DORA and GDPR at once, which clock runs first?
- How do we decide whether an incident is significant under NIS2?
- If we can't tell whether an incident is reportable and the deadline is close, then what?
- Who approves and submits a regulatory notification, including out of hours?