When do we…
When is a post-incident review needed, and what must it produce?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Give every Severity 1 and 2 incident its own review within 10 working days of closure, and review Severity 3 and 4 incidents and near misses together each quarter. Each review must produce owned, dated actions, a reassessment of the risks the incident touched and any changes to the plan, playbooks and matrix.
- Reasoning
- The review's outputs are what make the next incident go better, so a review with no owned actions or named risks is sent back. It looks at facts and conditions, not at people to blame; names appear in the timeline because they are facts. Reviewing smaller incidents together shows repeated causes no single one reveals, and catches any that should have been rated higher. A late report, a badly missed target or a repeated cause can justify a review of its own at any severity.
- Considerations
- The 10 working days, the risk reassessment window of 10 working days and the action due date of 90 calendar days are the pack's defaults. Your own policy may set others.
- If a NIS2 or DORA final report is still due, hold the review in time to feed it: the final report needs the root cause and the mitigation the review produces.
- The facilitator is the Head of Information Security or someone not involved in the response, and nobody approves their own review.
- 'User error' describes a person, and is the common reason a review is sent back. Find the condition that made the error likely.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 13 steps.
Start
An incident has closed
Closure means the recovery criteria are met, the monitoring period has passed without recurrence and the case log is complete. The review follows closure, so its clock starts there. The incident manager books it at closure.
- Then: Was it Severity 1 or 2?
In the pack
- P09-A04 Incident Classification, Severity & Escalation MatrixDefinitions
- P09-A03 Incident Response PlanReview
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateSteps
Decision
Was it Severity 1 or 2?
Severity 1 and 2 incidents each get a review of their own, one per incident. The rule is the policy's, so it applies to every Severity 1 and 2 incident whatever its category. Severity 3 and 4 incidents are not left out: they are reviewed together each quarter.
- Yes: Book it at closure; hold it within 10 working days
- No: Severity 3 or 4, or a near miss: Was a report late, a target badly missed, or a cause repeated?
In the pack
- P09-A02 Security Incident Management PolicyRecovery and learning (rule IM-11)
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWhen a review is held
Decision
Was a report late, a target badly missed, or a cause repeated?
These are the pack's grounds for a review of its own whatever the severity: a report made late, a target badly missed, or the same cause coming back. If you cannot yet tell, for example because a similar incident is still being analysed, take the yes branch and ask.
- Yes, or not known: Does the Head of Information Security call a review of its own?
- No: Review it with the quarter's Severity 3 and 4 incidents
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWhen a review is held
Decision
Does the Head of Information Security call a review of its own?
In the pack this is the Head of Information Security's decision. A report to an authority made late because the policy was not followed is itself reported to executive management with its cause. Whether a review of its own is the way to find that cause is your judgement; the pack does not require one.
- Yes: Book it at closure; hold it within 10 working days
- No: Review it with the quarter's Severity 3 and 4 incidents
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWhen a review is held
- P09-A02 Security Incident Management PolicyCompliance and consequences
Outcome
Review it with the quarter's Severity 3 and 4 incidents
Severity 3 and 4 incidents, and near misses, are reviewed together once a quarter on one form, with a row per incident: the review, measures against targets, what went well and what did not, root cause and actions. Look for repeated causes and for incidents that should have been rated higher. Five misdirected emails in a quarter point to one fix.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWhen a review is held
- P09-A03 Incident Response PlanYearly calendar (rule IM-11)
- P09-A08 Personal Data Breach Response PlaybookReview and reassess
Step
Book it at closure; hold it within 10 working days
The incident manager books the review at closure and fills in the incident, timeline, measures and reporting duties from the case log, so the meeting spends its time on analysis. The 10 working days is the policy's rule for Severity 1 and 2; for a review the Head of Information Security calls, the pack sets no deadline. The facilitator is the Head of Information Security or someone not involved in the response.
In the pack
- P09-A02 Security Incident Management PolicyRecovery and learning (rule IM-11)
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateSteps
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWho attends, and for how long
Decision
Is an authority final report still to be made?
A NIS2 final report is due within one month of the incident notification, and a DORA final report no later than one month after the latest intermediate report. Both need the root cause and the mitigation, which the review produces. If you are not sure whether one is still due, plan as if it is.
- Yes, or not known: Hold it in time to feed the final report
- No: Agree what happened, why, and what it cost
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateSteps
- P09-A04 Incident Classification, Severity & Escalation MatrixReporting Clocks (rules RD-04, RD-12)
Step
Hold it in time to feed the final report
Schedule the review so the root cause, mitigation and actions are ready before the final report is due. In the pack's example, the review 4 working days after closure supplied the NIS2 final report, sent before its deadline.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart K — Decision and approval
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart L — Follow-up
Step
Agree what happened, why, and what it cost
The meeting agrees what went well and what did not, the chain of 'why?' back to a root cause the organisation can change, and the impact. It looks at facts and conditions, not at people: names appear in the timeline because they are facts. 'User error' is a person, not a condition, and is the common reason a review is sent back. Attendees include the executive incident lead for Severity 1 and the Data Protection Officer where personal data was involved.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateField guidance
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart F — Root cause and contributing factors
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateWho attends, and for how long
Step
Name each risk touched, for its owner to reassess
An incident is a trigger for reassessing the risks it touches. Name each one by its ID in your risk register; its owner reassesses it within the risk pack's window, 10 working days by default, counted from the incident. 'Risk register to be updated' with no ID is sent back. If the incident came by a route no risk describes, ask whether a new risk is needed.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart H — Risks to reassess
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateSteps
- P09-A08 Personal Data Breach Response PlaybookReview and reassess
Step
Give every action an owner, a due date and a link
Each point that did not go well leads to an action, or says why none is needed. One change per action, owned by a role, with a due date and a link to the risk, plan or playbook it changes. The pack's default due date is within 90 calendar days of the review. 'Raise awareness' with no owner or date is sent back. Enter every action in your incident case and action log.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart I — Actions
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart E — What went well, and what did not
Step
Change the plan, playbooks and matrix where needed
Name each change against the document it changes, or say why none is needed. After every Severity 1 incident the plan is reviewed, and the review is recorded in its revision history even if nothing changes.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart J — Updates to the plan, playbooks and matrix
- P09-A02 Security Incident Management PolicyTesting and reporting (rule IM-12)
- P09-A03 Incident Response PlanYearly calendar
Outcome
Approved, then followed up each quarter until done
The Head of Information Security approves every review; for Severity 1 the executive incident lead approves too. Nobody signs off their own review. The actions are followed up at each quarterly report until closed. Open actions past their due date are counted in the quarterly report to executive management, where the pack's target is none more than 30 days overdue.
In the pack
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart K — Decision and approval
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplatePart L — Follow-up
- P09-A11 Post-Incident Review TemplateAdapting this template
- P09-A02 Security Incident Management PolicyCompliance and consequences (rule IMM-03)
Practical checklist
- Book the review at closure and fill in the incident, timeline, measures and reporting duties from the case log.
- Hold it within 10 working days of closure for Severity 1 and 2, and before any final report to an authority is due.
- Agree what went well and what did not, the chain of 'why?' back to a root cause you can change, and the impact.
- Name each risk the incident touched by its register ID, for its owner to reassess.
- Give every action one owner, a due date and a link to the risk, plan or playbook it changes.
- Name each change to the plan, playbooks and matrix, or say why none is needed.
- Follow up the actions each quarter until every one is closed.
Evidence to have ready
- The review report for every Severity 1 and 2 incident, dated against the closure date.
- Each action with its owner and due date in your incident case and action log.
- The reassessment of each risk touched, in your risk register.
- The plan's revision history after every Severity 1 incident, even where nothing changed.
- The quarterly review of Severity 3 and 4 incidents and near misses.
Assumptions
- You grade incidents on four severity levels and close them against recovery criteria, as the pack does. The 10 working days, the risk reassessment window and the action due dates are the pack's defaults; your own policy may set others.
- Your risk register and your incident case and action log are where the review's outputs go. The review is held in your own process and recorded in your own records.
Not covered here
- When an exercise finds a gap, and how to make sure it is fixed. That is “If an exercise finds a gap, then how do we make sure it is fixed and stays fixed?”.
- When a risk needs reassessing outside the annual cycle. That is “When does a risk need reassessing outside the annual cycle?”.
- Which reports are due to authorities, and when. That is “When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?”.
Related questions
- When does a risk need reassessing outside the annual cycle?
- If an exercise finds a gap, then how do we make sure it is fixed and stays fixed?
- When do we have to notify a regulator, and under which regime?
- When one incident triggers NIS2, DORA and GDPR at once, which clock runs first?
- When do we tell the board during an incident?