Independent thinking. Informed defence.

CISO Times

Intelligence for the people behind the defence.

The CISO Decision Brief

How do we…

How long should the observation period be, and what do we send customers in the gap?

8 decision pointsThe pack behind this answer: SOC 2 Report Readiness

Add to board memo

The short answer

Recommendation
Pick the longest of 3, 6 or 12 months that gets the report to the customer in time, or a customer's longer written minimum, and agree the dates in writing with the CPA firm. Send a bridge letter only once the report exists and the period ended about 3 months ago or less. After that, send the next report.
Reasoning
The AICPA's SOC 2 guide sets no minimum period, but says a Type 2 examination for under two months is unlikely to give the CPA firm enough evidence, so your customers and your CPA firm decide. The lengths of 3, 6 and 12 months, the 2 months to issue the report and the 3 months of operation before a first period are market practice or house defaults. A bridge letter is management's statement about the interval after the period. The CPA firm gives no assurance over it, so it covers a limited gap and never replaces the next report.
Considerations
  • Count the time to issue the report from the last day of the period. The pack allows 2 months as a house default, so ask your firm for its own figure.
  • A customer's stated minimum overrides the period that would otherwise fit your date, so ask each customer before you commit.
  • Any date you give a customer for the report is a commitment, so log it with an owner.

The decision, step by step

Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.

  • Start
  • Step
  • Decision
  • Outcome
  • Loop back

Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.

Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one. A code beside a source, such as RR-17, is the number of a rule in that pack document; the document lists its rules.

Read as text

The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 22 steps.
  1. Start

    We need a Type 2 period and a plan for the gap after it

    The period is the stretch of time the CPA firm tests. The gap is the time between its last day and the day a customer holds the report. Decide the length first, then what customers receive meanwhile. Nothing here is an AICPA rule: the lengths and limits are market practice or house defaults, and your CPA firm and customers decide.

    In the pack

  2. Decision

    Have the controls run, with records, for about 3 months?

    A control must run before it can be observed. The pack's default is that controls have operated, with records, for at least 3 months before a first Type 2 period starts. Count from the day each control began to run and left records, not from the day it was written down.

    In the pack

  3. Outcome

    Get ready first, or take a Type 1 report first

    If controls are not yet running at all, start neither report: run the readiness self-assessment, close the blocking items and come back. If they run but for under about 3 months, expect exceptions early in a short first period, or take a Type 1 report first and begin the Type 2 period when the controls have run. Tell customers where you are in plain words.

    In the pack

  4. Step

    Pick the longest of 3, 6 or 12 months that fits your date

    Count back from the date the customer needs the report. The period plus the time the CPA firm needs to issue the report must end before it. The pack allows 2 months to issue as a house default, so ask your firm. With no date set the pack's method uses 12 months, and if none fits it uses 3 and says that it does not fit.

    In the pack

  5. Decision

    Does a customer state a longer minimum in writing?

    The AICPA's SOC 2 guide sets no minimum period, though it says under two months is unlikely to give enough evidence, so a customer's own requirement is the one to find. A customer's stated minimum overrides the period that would otherwise fit your date. Ask each customer that has asked for the report and keep the answer in writing. If you have not asked, the answer is not known: ask first.

    In the pack

  6. Step

    Ask each customer whether it states a minimum

    Ask each customer that has asked for the report whether it states a minimum period, and keep the answer in writing. A customer's stated minimum overrides the period that would otherwise fit your date, so find it before you choose.

    In the pack

  7. Step

    Use the customer's minimum and note any that differ

    Where a customer states a minimum longer than the period that fits, the pack's method uses the minimum and then checks whether it still fits your date. If two customers ask for different things, decide for the one report you will commission and record what each asked, so the sponsor can see which request it does not serve.

    In the pack

  8. Decision

    Does the period plus time to issue end before the customer's date?

    The report is not in the customer's hands on the last day of the period. The CPA firm needs time to issue it, and firms differ, so ask yours. If the period you need does not fit the date, say so before you commit rather than after.

    In the pack

  9. Step

    Tell the customer early and offer a Type 1 report

    When the period and the time to issue do not fit the date, the pack asks you to talk to the customer about a Type 1 report before you commit. If you already hold a report, a bridge letter can cover the interval after its period. The customer decides what it accepts. A period shorter than the firm can test properly is one of the pack's warning signs about a firm.

    In the pack

  10. Step

    Agree the period dates in writing with the CPA firm

    Put the start and end dates in the engagement letter, or in an email the firm has confirmed, before the period starts. Do not change them during the period without the firm. The pack's house default is to have readiness complete and the dates agreed 14 days before the period starts.

    In the pack

  11. Step

    Plan the next period to start the day after this one ends

    Start the next period on the day after the last one ends so that no day is uncovered. Have its engagement letter in hand by the day the next period starts. If the CPA firm will continue, ask how consecutive periods are scheduled.

    In the pack

  12. Decision

    Has the period ended?

    The answer decides which of the pack's four words applies: Period still running, Bridge letter suitable, Beyond a bridge letter, or Next report issued. The rule looks only at dates. While the period runs there is no interval to describe, so there is nothing for a letter to say.

    In the pack

  13. Outcome

    Say when the period ends and when the report is expected

    Do not send a bridge letter while the period runs. Give the end date and the expected date of the report as an expectation, in your approved words. The expected date depends on the period and on the CPA firm. Log any date you give a customer as a commitment.

    In the pack

  14. Decision

    Has the CPA firm issued the report?

    A bridge letter refers to a report, so there must be one. Before the report exists there is nothing to bridge from. The pack's house default expects the report about 2 months after the period ends, and firms differ.

    In the pack

  15. Outcome

    Say where the report stands and send no letter yet

    Tell the customer in plain words that the report is not yet issued and when you expect it. Offer what you can send meanwhile: the security overview, the standard security commitments schedule and a completed questionnaire. Log the date you give as a commitment.

    In the pack

  16. Decision

    Did the period end about 3 months ago or less?

    About three months after the period ends is the limit advisory sources usually give for a bridge letter. That is market practice, not a rule, and some customers state their own limit. Ask your larger customers what they accept.

    In the pack

  17. Decision

    Can management say from its records how the controls have run since?

    The letter states what management knows about the interval from its own monitoring: the checkpoints, the exceptions calendar, the incident log, the change records and the access reviews. If you cannot read them for the interval, you do not yet have a basis. A letter that says less is better than one that says what nobody checked.

    In the pack

  18. Outcome

    Release a bridge letter with the report

    Name the report exactly, state the interval, the changes, the incidents and any open exception, and say that the CPA firm did not examine the interval or issue the letter. An executive who speaks for management signs it, Legal reads it and the examination owner releases it. Say what management knows, never that the controls are effective. Send it only under a confidentiality agreement.

    In the pack

  19. Outcome

    Send the report with a plain note and no letter

    Send the report you hold, named exactly, and say when the next one is expected. Do not write a letter that says more than your records support. Hold the management checkpoints in the next period, so that the next interval has a basis.

    In the pack

  20. Decision

    Has the next report been issued?

    Past about three months a letter no longer bridges the gap. If the next report exists, it takes the place of the letter. If it does not, the customer decides what it relies on, and you tell it plainly when the report is expected.

    In the pack

  21. Outcome

    Send the next report and stop sending letters

    The next report takes the place of the letter. Name it exactly by type, categories, system and period, and send it under the confidentiality terms. Stop sending letters for the old period.

    In the pack

  22. Outcome

    Give the expected date, log it, and do not stretch a letter

    Tell the customer plainly when the next report is expected and send the report you hold with its period named exactly. Do not stretch a letter past its window. Log the date as a commitment with an owner. A letter for a gap of nine months is a listed mistake.

    In the pack

Practical checklist

  1. Check the controls have run, with records, for about 3 months before the period starts.
  2. Ask each customer for its date and any minimum length, in writing.
  3. Agree the start and end dates with the CPA firm in the engagement letter.
  4. Put the next period on the calendar to start the day after this one ends.
  5. Name the report exactly in every message: type, categories, system and period.
  6. Release a bridge letter only after Legal and the examination owner have approved it.

Evidence to have ready

  • The engagement letter, or an email the CPA firm has confirmed, with the period dates.
  • Each customer's stated date and minimum, with where it came from.
  • The release record for each bridge letter, with the approvers and the date.
  • The log of every report date given to a customer, kept as a commitment.

Assumptions

  • You are commissioning a SOC 2 Type 2 report from a licensed CPA firm. A Type 1 report is as of one date and has no observation period.
  • The lengths of 3, 6 and 12 months, the 2 months to issue the report and the 3 months of operation first are market practice and house defaults. They are not AICPA rules. Your CPA firm and your customers decide.
  • A bridge letter is market practice. The CPA firm does not issue it, and each customer decides whether it accepts one.

Not covered here