If…, then how…
If an ICT provider we use is designated critical under DORA, then what changes for us?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Check your providers against the list and record the date, confirm any designation with the provider, flag it and link its arrangements, keep your own contract and exit duties, and act on risks your authority passes on.
- Reasoning
- Designation puts the provider under direct oversight. Your duties stay yours, and a designated provider is no shortcut for your contract terms or exit plan. The practical change is that your authority passes on the risks identified in the Lead Overseer's recommendations, which you must take into account, and as a last resort may require you to suspend or end use of the service.
- Considerations
- The list is published by the European authorities and updated yearly. Check the current list, not a summary.
- Check subcontractors too, since a listed provider can sit behind your direct provider.
- Your authority passes on the risks identified in the recommendations; how it does so is for your authority and national arrangements. Ask it.
- This question covers the customer's side only. A provider that is designated deals with the Lead Overseer.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one. A code beside a source, such as RR-17, is the number of a rule in that pack document; the document lists its rules.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 21 steps.
Start
A provider we use may be on the European list of critical providers
DORA lets the European Supervisory Authorities designate ICT providers that are critical for financial entities and place them under direct oversight by a Lead Overseer. The oversight is of the provider. Your own duties under DORA stay the same, whether or not your provider is designated. What changes is what you may hear, and what a supervisor may ask of you.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
Decision
Are we a financial entity under DORA?
This question is for the customer. If you are the provider, you deal with the Lead Overseer yourself and should take advice. If you are a financial entity, carry on. If you are not sure, settle your scope first.
- Yes: Check every provider in your register against the current list
- No, or not known: Settle what you are first; a provider needs its own advice
In the pack
- P21-A02 DORA Proportionality & Scope AssessmentResult
Outcome
Settle what you are first; a provider needs its own advice
A financial entity is the audience for this question. A provider that thinks it may be designated, or that supplies financial entities, should start with the flow-down question and take legal advice on the oversight framework. Return here once you know you are the financial entity.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibrarySupplier Flow-Down
Step
Check every provider in your register against the current list
The authorities publish the list of designated critical ICT providers and update it yearly. Check each provider and subcontractor in the register against it, and write down the date you checked. The first list was published in November 2025. A provider not on the list may still ask to be designated.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyProviders
Decision
Is any of your providers on the list?
The list covers only the providers the authorities have designated. Check subcontractors as well as direct providers, since a listed provider can sit behind your direct one.
- Yes, or not known: Confirm the designation with the provider and note the date
- No: None listed: record the check and repeat it at each update
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopySupply chain
Outcome
None listed: record the check and repeat it at each update
Keep the date and the list version. Repeat the check at each yearly update and when you add a provider. Do not tell a supervisor that your providers are not critical in their own right: the list only says which ones the authorities have designated.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
Step
Confirm the designation with the provider and note the date
A designated provider must tell the financial entities it serves of its designation. Ask it in writing, if you have not heard, which of your services are covered, and when oversight starts. Keep the reply with the arrangement.
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyArrangements
Decision
Is the provider established outside the Union?
A provider established in a third country that is designated critical must set up a subsidiary in the Union within a set period after designation, or financial entities may not go on using it. Ask where it stands. Not known takes the yes branch.
- Yes, or not known: Ask for its plan and date for an EU subsidiary and prepare a fallback
- No: Flag the provider and link every arrangement it supports
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
Step
Ask for its plan and date for an EU subsidiary and prepare a fallback
Ask the provider when its Union subsidiary will exist and which contracts will move to it. Plan what you would do if it did not meet the period: the exit strategy for the arrangement is where that plan lives. Tell your management body of the dependency.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
Step
Flag the provider and link every arrangement it supports
Mark the provider as designated in your register notes or supplier register, with the date of designation. Link it to each arrangement and each function it supports, including those through subcontractors. This is the list a supervisor will ask for.
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyArrangements
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopySupply chain
Decision
Does it support a critical or important function of yours?
Designation makes oversight of the provider stronger. It does not tell you whether a function of yours is critical. The function list does, and the contract terms and exit plan follow from it.
- Yes, or not known: Check the contract terms, the exit plan and the concentration
- No: Review the provider on its normal cycle
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyFunctions
Step
Check the contract terms, the exit plan and the concentration
The extra contract terms for critical or important functions, the exit strategy and the concentration assessment stay your duties. Designation of the provider does not satisfy them. Use the contract review, the exit question and the question on one provider behind many services.
In the pack
- P21-A03 DORA Article-to-Control Mapping LibraryRequirement Library
See also
- How do we review our existing ICT contracts against DORA's contract terms and decide what to do about each gap?
- How do we leave an ICT provider that supports a critical or important function without stopping the service?
- If many of our critical services depend on one provider, then what do we do about it?
Step
Review the provider on its normal cycle
Keep the provider in the register with the designation flag. Reassess it with its tier. If it later supports a critical or important function, update your function list and tell your authority, as its route asks.
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyArrangements
Decision
Has your authority passed on risks from a provider's recommendations?
The Lead Overseer can issue recommendations to the provider. Your competent authority passes on to you the risks that those recommendations identify, and you must take those risks into account in managing your third-party risk. Not known: ask your authority.
Step
Keep checking the list and your authority's notices
Ask the provider how it responds to oversight and what it tells customers. Watch for your authority's notices. When one arrives, treat it as a trigger to reassess the arrangement.
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyArrangements
Outcome
Nothing to change now; the designation is recorded and watched
Keep the check, the confirmation, the flag and the monitoring. Do not say the provider's oversight reduces your own duties, and do not describe the provider as approved by the authorities. Designation is not an endorsement.
In the pack
- P21-A06 ICT Third-Party Arrangements Register — Working CopyArrangements
Step
Take the identified risks into account and record what you did
Assess your exposure to each risk the authority passed on. Decide whether the contract needs changes, whether a control on your side reduces the risk, or whether the dependency needs a plan to reduce it. Record the decision and the owner.
Decision
Can you show the risks are addressed, in the contract or otherwise?
The authority can ask whether you took the risks into account. If it considers you have not dealt with them, it may notify you that a decision could follow unless appropriate contractual arrangements are in place; you may not have heard that yet. Not known takes the no branch.
Outcome
Risks addressed and recorded; keep watching for the next notice
Keep the assessment, the contract changes or controls and the management body's record. Repeat when the next notice or list arrives. Do not state that the recommendations are met by the provider, since you did not receive the outcome from the Lead Overseer.
In the pack
- P21-A09 DORA Gap & Remediation TrackerGaps
Step
Close the gaps and escalate; use any notice period you are given
Fix the contract terms or controls that address each risk, and take the gap to the management body at once. If your authority has notified you that a decision may follow, Article 42(4) refers to a decision within 60 calendar days of receipt of that notice, absent appropriate contractual arrangements, so work to 60 days. Make the exit plan real, because as a last resort the authority may require you to suspend or end the use of the service.
Outcome
Management body decides: negotiate, reduce reliance or prepare to exit
Put the choice to the management body with the facts, the dates and the cost of each option. If suspension or termination became necessary, the authority must allow time to use your exit plan, which only helps if it exists and has been tested.
Practical checklist
- Check every provider and subcontractor against the current list and record the date.
- Confirm any designation with the provider in writing.
- Flag the provider and link the arrangements and functions it supports.
- Keep your contract terms, exit plan and concentration assessment up to date.
- Take any risks your authority passes on into account and record what you did.
- Escalate to the management body if a decision may follow.
Evidence to have ready
- The check against the list with its date.
- The provider's confirmation of designation.
- The register flag and links to arrangements.
- Records of risks passed on and the actions taken.
Assumptions
- DORA binds you as a financial entity and you keep a register of information that lists providers and subcontractors.
- You have a function list, so you know which arrangements support critical or important functions.
- Your competent authority tells you how it communicates with you about oversight, and national arrangements may add to it.
Not covered here
- Whether DORA binds you. That is “Is our organisation a financial entity under DORA, and which duties follow?”.
- Reviewing contracts against the contract terms. That is “How do we review our existing ICT contracts against DORA's contract terms and decide what to do about each gap?”.
- Leaving a provider behind a critical or important function. That is “How do we leave an ICT provider that supports a critical or important function without stopping the service?”.
- What to do when many critical services depend on one provider. That is “If many of our critical services depend on one provider, then what do we do about it?”.
Related questions
- If many of our critical services depend on one provider, then what do we do about it?
- How do we leave an ICT provider that supports a critical or important function without stopping the service?
- How do we review our existing ICT contracts against DORA's contract terms and decide what to do about each gap?
- How do we build and keep our register of information on ICT third-party arrangements?
- If a customer that is a financial entity asks us to accept DORA contract terms, then what do we do?