When do we…
When is a risk outside appetite, and what has to happen then?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- A risk is outside appetite when its residual band is above the band its category's appetite allows, and outside tolerance when it is also above the tolerance band. Outside appetite, the owner decides treatment within the window. Outside tolerance, the board chair is told out of cycle and the board or its equivalent decides.
- Reasoning
- Once appetite is set as a band, the position follows from two facts: the residual band after controls that work, and the category's appetite level. Tolerance is the highest band carried for a time while a plan brings the risk back; above it, the board must act, not just be told. A Critical risk is above every tolerance. Outside appetite within tolerance, the owner chooses to reduce, avoid, transfer or accept. Accepting a risk does not bring it back within appetite: it stays counted until its residual score falls or the board changes the appetite.
- Considerations
- The appetite levels, the 30-day window, the 5 working days and the review intervals are the defaults in the CISO Times risk management pack. Your own appetite statement may set different ones.
- Accepting a risk outside appetite needs executive management's signature as well as the band's usual approvers, never instead.
- Past tolerance, only the board or its equivalent may decide: the board, or a board risk committee it has delegated to; the management board in a two-tier structure; executive management where there is no board.
- Changing the appetite is legitimate only as an open, recorded board decision, followed by a retest of every risk in that category.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 15 steps.
Start
A risk has been scored or rescored
Whether a risk is acceptable is not a matter of opinion once appetite is set as a band. The position follows from two facts: the risk's residual band and its category's appetite level. It is always stated in words: within appetite; outside appetite, within tolerance; or outside tolerance.
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelAppetite, tolerance and position (rule RM-05)
Step
Take the residual band, after controls that work
Test the score after existing controls that are in place and shown to work. The inherent score shows what the controls are worth; the residual score is the risk actually carried, and the only one appetite is compared with. Bands are Low 1–3, Medium 4–6, High 8–9 and Critical 12–16.
In the pack
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateHow a level becomes a test against the register
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelThe matrix
Step
Look up its category's appetite and tolerance
Each category has one level. Averse: appetite Low, tolerance Medium. Cautious: appetite Medium, tolerance High. Open: appetite and tolerance both High, so an Open risk that leaves appetite is already past tolerance. If two categories could apply, use the one with the lower appetite.
In the pack
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateThe three appetite levels
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelInputs
Decision
Is the residual band above the tolerance band?
Tolerance is the highest band tolerated for a time while a plan brings the risk back. Above it, the risk has passed the point where the board said it must act, not just be told. Critical is above every tolerance. If the band or category is uncertain, take the higher band and the lower appetite.
- Yes, or not sure: Tell the board chair out of cycle
- No: Is the residual band above the appetite band?
In the pack
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateAppetite and tolerance
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelThe position rule
Decision
Is the residual band above the appetite band?
Appetite is the highest band accepted without escalation. For example, a High risk in a Cautious category is outside appetite, within tolerance; a Medium risk in the same category is within appetite.
- Yes, or not sure: Record the date and start the 30-day decision window
- No: Within appetite: the owner reviews it each quarter
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelThe position rule
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelExample 1 — R-01, High and outside appetite
Outcome
Within appetite: the owner reviews it each quarter
No new decision is needed. The owner may still reduce it where that is cheap, and reviews it every quarter. It appears in the quarterly report to executive management like every other risk.
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelTreatment
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateOutside appetite, outside tolerance: what happens
Step
Record the date and start the 30-day decision window
Record in the register the date the risk was first assessed outside appetite. The owner's treatment decision is due within 30 calendar days of it, in the pack's defaults, and later reviews do not restart the window. The risk is reported to executive management each quarter and in the next board report, which opens with the position.
In the pack
- P05-A03 Risk Identification & Assessment Operating ProcedureStage 5 — Record in the register
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateOutside appetite, outside tolerance: what happens (rule RM-06)
- P03-A02 Board Reporting Narrative ModelStating the position against appetite and tolerance
Decision
What does the owner decide within the window?
The owner chooses one of four: reduce the likelihood or impact, avoid by stopping the activity, transfer part of the impact by insurance or contract, or accept the risk knowingly. The owner may delegate the work, not the decision.
- Reduce, avoid or transfer: Plan the actions, each with an owner, date, cost and target
- Accept: Accept with executive management signing as well
- No decision by the deadline: No decision in time: escalate to executive management
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelTreatment
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelEvery risk has one owner
Outcome
Plan the actions, each with an owner, date, cost and target
Each action has an owner, a due date, a cost and the residual score expected when it is done. The risk stays outside appetite until the actions are complete and shown to work. Only then does the expected score become the residual score.
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelInherent and residual scores (rule RM-07)
- P05-A07 Risk Treatment PlanActions
Outcome
Accept with executive management signing as well
The band's usual approvers sign, and executive management signs as well, never instead. Record it on your acceptance form with the reason, conditions and a review date. The risk still counts as outside appetite until its residual score falls or the board changes the appetite.
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelWhat the band decides (rule RM-08)
- P05-A08 Risk Acceptance Form & Approval RecordPart C — Approval
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateOutside appetite, outside tolerance: what happens
Outcome
No decision in time: escalate to executive management
The Head of Information Security escalates, naming the risk, its band and position, the date missed and the decision needed. A risk kept outside appetite for more than a quarter without a decision is reported by name to executive management. It is the gap auditors and regulators look for first.
In the pack
- P05-A03 Risk Identification & Assessment Operating ProcedureEscalation
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelTreatment
- P05-A03 Risk Identification & Assessment Operating ProcedureStage 6 — Decide treatment
Step
Tell the board chair out of cycle
Within 5 working days in the pack's defaults, the chair hears of it without waiting for the next meeting; a Critical risk also goes to executive management at once. The note says what happened, what it may cost, what is being done and by when, and what is not yet known. The board takes the decision at its next meeting. Where there is no board, as in an owner-managed company, tell executive management.
In the pack
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateOutside appetite, outside tolerance: what happens
- P03-A02 Board Reporting Narrative ModelReporting bad news
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelWhat the band decides
Decision
What does the board decide?
Only the board or its equivalent may decide a risk past tolerance: the board, or a board risk committee it has delegated to; the management board in a two-tier structure; executive management where there is no board. The band's usual approvers recommend. The board has three options.
- Fund or order treatment: Plan the actions, each with an owner, date, cost and target
- Accept the risk explicitly: Record the board's acceptance, reason and review date
- Change the appetite: Change the appetite openly, as a recorded board decision
In the pack
- P05-A02 Risk Assessment Methodology & Scoring ModelWhat the band decides (rule RM-08)
- P03-A02 Board Reporting Narrative ModelStating the position against appetite and tolerance
Outcome
Record the board's acceptance, reason and review date
Record the acceptance on your acceptance form with the board's reason, its conditions and the minute. In the pack's defaults a Critical acceptance is reviewed within 3 months and a High one within 6. The risk stays counted as past tolerance in the board measure until its residual score falls.
In the pack
- P05-A08 Risk Acceptance Form & Approval RecordPart C — Approval
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateOutside appetite, outside tolerance: what happens
Outcome
Change the appetite openly, as a recorded board decision
Raising a category's appetite to bring a risk back within it is a legitimate choice. It must be made openly as a board decision, with its reason, and never as a quiet edit to the register or the statement. Then retest every risk in that category against the new level.
In the pack
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateReviewing and changing the statement
- P05-A04 Cyber Risk Appetite Statement TemplateBefore you send it for approval
Practical checklist
- Take the residual band after controls that are in place and shown to work.
- Look up the category's appetite and tolerance, using the lower appetite where two categories could apply.
- Record the date the risk was first assessed outside appetite.
- Have the owner decide to reduce, avoid, transfer or accept within the window, and escalate if no decision comes.
- Plan each treatment action with an owner, due date, cost and expected residual score.
- Tell the board chair out of cycle for a risk past tolerance, and put the three options to the board.
Evidence to have ready
- The register entry with the residual band, category, position and the date first assessed outside appetite.
- The owner's treatment decision and date, and the treatment plan.
- The signed acceptance form with reason, conditions and review date, or the board minute recording its decision.
- The out-of-cycle note to the chair and any escalation for a missed decision.
Assumptions
- Your appetite is set per risk category as a band on the same scale the register uses, and has been approved.
- The appetite levels, bands and timings shown are the defaults in the CISO Times risk management pack. Your own appetite statement may set different ones.
Not covered here
- Who signs an acceptance at each band. That is “Who can accept a risk, and does the answer change with its rating?”.
- How to choose between the four treatments. That is “How do we decide between treating, transferring, avoiding and accepting a risk?”.
- What to do when the business wants to accept a risk you think is unacceptable. That is “If the business wants to accept a risk I think is unacceptable, then how do I proceed?”.
Related questions
- How do we decide between treating, transferring, avoiding and accepting a risk?
- Who can accept a risk, and does the answer change with its rating?
- If the business wants to accept a risk I think is unacceptable, then how do I proceed?
- If risks sit "in treatment" for years, then how do we get them moving?
- When do we tell the board about bad news between meetings?
- When does a risk need reassessing outside the annual cycle?