Ransomware Response Playbook
Covers containment, recovery sequencing, extortion decisions and regulatory triggers specific to a ransomware event.
Available soon
- Format
- Word
- Size
- 75 KB
- Length
- 25 pages
- Version
- 1.3
- Updated
What's inside
What changed
- 1.3
The example restore order follows the continuity plan: foundations, then the shortest recovery time first, with the targets from P22 (RR-08).
- 1.2
RD-10 now states DORA's rule for an incident classified as major only after 24 hours: the initial notification is due within 4 hours of that classification (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301, Article 5(2)).
- 1.1
Containment and site isolation step S3 are least disruptive first, with the service owner and specialists brought in before a service people depend on for safety or essential operations is stopped; the incident manager and executive incident lead are two people even in a small organisation.
Earlier versions (1)
- 1.0
Published.
Preview
The document from section 1, as you will receive it. Highlighted [[text]] is for you to replace; shaded guidance boxes are for you to delete before approval. The cover and document control pages are in the file.
Scenario and triggers
Use this playbook when ransomware or other destructive malware is suspected or confirmed: category IC-01, ransomware or destructive malware (files encrypted; ransom note; systems wiped), in the Incident Classification, Severity & Escalation Matrix. It adds the ransomware steps to the Incident Response Plan; everything the plan says still applies, and where they seem to differ the plan's rules (Security Incident Management Policy) win.
Ransomware is usually the last stage of an attack, not the first. The attacker gets in (often through a phishing email or weak remote access), gains administrator rights, spreads, often copies data out, tries to delete or encrypt the backups, and only then encrypts files and leaves a demand. So by the time a note appears, assume the attacker has been inside for some time, may still be, and may have taken data.
Triggers
Start this playbook on any of these signs. Anyone who sees one reports it at once through the reporting route (IM-01). Nobody waits to be sure.
Sign | What it looks like | Who usually sees it first |
|---|---|---|
T-01 A ransom note | A message on screen, a new text or web file in many folders, or a changed desktop background, demanding payment to unlock files or to keep stolen data from being published. | Any user; the IT service desk |
T-02 Files renamed or unreadable in bulk | Many files suddenly carrying a new, unfamiliar ending to their name, or files that will not open; an alert from the security monitoring provider about mass file changes or encryption activity. | Users; the security monitoring provider |
T-03 Backups deleted or failing | Backup jobs deleted, switched off or all failing at once; backup copies or snapshots removed; how long backups are kept changed without a change request. | The backup provider; IT operations |
T-04 An endpoint protection alert | The security software on PCs and servers reports ransomware behaviour, reports that someone tried to switch it off, or finds a tool attackers use to move between systems. | The security monitoring provider |
T-05 Unusual administrator activity | New administrator accounts nobody asked for, administrator sign-ins at odd hours or from odd places, or security tools switched off on many devices at once. | The security monitoring provider; IT operations |
T-06 A claim that our data has been stolen | An email, call or post saying someone holds our data and will publish it unless paid, with or without any encryption. | Anyone, often a manager or the communications lead |
What a user does on seeing a sign
- Disconnect the device from the network: unplug the network cable and switch off wireless. Leave the device switched on. Switching off destroys evidence held in memory and can damage files that are part-way through being encrypted.
- Do not open, reply to, or follow any link or contact in a ransom note.
- Call the IT service desk on [[service desk number]], out of hours [[out-of-hours number]], and say what you saw and when. Write down the time.
- Do not try to clean the device, restore files or run other tools on it.
Guidance — delete before approval
Print the user steps above on one page and put them where staff will find them with the network down: on notice boards and in the staff handbook. Replace the numbers first.
Add the alert names your security monitoring provider and backup system use for T-02 to T-05, so the IT service desk recognises them.
What this playbook does not cover
- Other malware that is found and removed without encryption (IC-02): the Incident Response Plan alone.
- Ransomware at a supplier that holds our data or runs our service (IC-10): the plan's supplier steps; use this playbook's decisions D2 and D5, and Communications and regulatory triggers, where our data or service is affected.
- A personal data breach without ransomware: the Personal Data Breach Response Playbook. Where ransomware takes or locks personal data, both playbooks run together (decision D2).
Severity mapping
The matrix sets the rule (IM-04): “Severity is the highest level any impact area reaches, judged on what the incident has done or is capable of doing. When in doubt, choose the higher level. Severity is reviewed at every update and can be raised by anyone on the response team; it is lowered only by the incident manager, with the reason recorded in the case log.”
This playbook adds a floor: confirmed ransomware is never below Severity 2. Encryption is harm already done, and ransomware is built to spread, so the matrix's “when in doubt, choose the higher level” always reaches at least Severity 2. Severity 1 is set as soon as any one of the Severity 1 situations below is true or likely.
Which severity:
Situation | Severity | Why: the matrix criterion it meets |
|---|---|---|
Encryption on one device, isolated quickly, no sign of it on any other device, no core service affected | Severity 2 High | The playbook floor, and Severity 2, Spread: “One system or account compromised with elevated rights, and contained” (ransomware normally runs with elevated rights) |
Encryption on more than one device, or signs of it spreading, or an administrator account used by the attacker | Severity 1 Critical | Severity 1, Spread: “Malware or an attacker spreading, or administrator-level access to core systems” |
A core customer service stopped, or likely to stop, for more than the matrix's time | Severity 1 Critical | Severity 1, Service: “A core customer service stopped, or likely to stop, for more than [[4 hours]]” |
An internal critical service stopped (for example finance, or a site's office systems) with no customer service affected | Severity 2 High | Severity 2, Service: “A core customer service degraded, or an internal critical service stopped” |
Data taken or likely taken at scale: a credible claim with samples, or large unexplained transfers out | Severity 1 Critical | Severity 1, Data: “Personal or customer data at scale taken or exposed, or likely to be” |
Personal data of a limited number of people taken or locked | Severity 2 High | Severity 2, Data: “Personal data of individuals exposed, lost or altered, in limited numbers” |
Likely to be a significant incident (NIS2) or a major ICT-related incident (DORA) | Severity 1 Critical | Severity 1, Legal and regulatory: “Likely a significant incident (NIS2), a major ICT-related incident (DORA), or a breach that individuals must be told of” |
Losses from downtime, recovery and lost orders likely above the matrix's upper threshold | Severity 1 Critical | Severity 1, Financial: “Loss likely above [[€1,000,000]]” |
Who is told, and how often, at each severity is in first-hour steps 3 and 6. Keep the floor at Severity 2: ransomware first called less severe usually turns out to have spread further than anyone knew.
First-hour actions
The plan's first hour (Incident Triage & First-Hour Assessment Procedure) in its order, with what each step means for ransomware. With ransomware harm is spreading, so containment runs before investigation, alongside steps 5 and 6.
# | Step of the plan | In this playbook | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Open the case | Record the time of the first alert and the time of declaration separately: declaration starts the reporting clocks. Category IC-01. Note which trigger (T-01 to T-06) started it. | Incident manager |
2 | Set severity and category | At least Severity 2. Severity 1 if it is spreading, a core service is hit or data may have been taken (Severity mapping). | Incident manager |
3 | Escalate | Severity 1: Incident manager at once; executive incident lead within 30 minutes; crisis team convened within 1 hour; board chair, or equivalent, within 4 hours. Severity 2: Incident manager at once; executive incident lead within 2 hours. Use CT-01 Incident alert to the response team and CT-02 Executive and board briefing. | Incident manager |
4 | Contain what is spreading | Run containment C1 to C7 below at once. The incident manager may isolate a device, site or account without waiting for an executive, using the least disruptive containment that stops the harm, and brings in the service owner and specialists before any action that would stop a service people depend on for safety or essential operations (decision rights: “Isolate a system, site or account”, incident manager). | Incident manager, with the technical responders |
5 | Start the reporting screen | NIS2: ransomware on more than one device is usually capable of severe disruption. GDPR: personal data that is encrypted and unavailable is a personal data breach even if nothing was taken. DORA where it applies. Add the insurer (RD-15) and the crime report (RD-16). Complete within 4 hours (IM-06). | Incident manager, with the Data Protection Officer |
6 | Set the next update | Severity 1: every 2 hours, round the clock until contained. Severity 2: every 4 hours. Agree a way to talk that does not depend on the affected network: [[phone bridge or out-of-band chat]]. | Incident manager |
Containment in the first hour
Run these in parallel, as soon as the incident is declared. Record the time each is done in the case log.
# | Action | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Isolate affected devices from the network: unplug or quarantine them through the endpoint protection console. Do not switch them off or restart them. | Technical responders (managed IT service provider) | At once |
C2 | Isolate the site or network segment if more than one device is affected or the source is unknown: follow the site isolation steps below. Cut it off from the other sites, the hosted services and the internet, keeping only what the responders need and anything S3 keeps running. | Incident manager decides; managed IT service provider does it | At once, if spreading |
C3 | Stop synchronisation and scheduled backup jobs that touch affected systems, so encrypted files do not overwrite good copies: file synchronisation, replication and backups of the affected systems. | Backup service provider, with the managed IT service provider | Within [[30 minutes]] |
C4 | Protect the backups. Confirm at least one copy is offline or immutable and cannot be reached from the affected network. Disconnect the backup system from the affected network and from the shared sign-in directory; change the backup console's credentials from a clean device; turn on any second approval for deleting backups. | Backup service provider | Within [[30 minutes]] |
C5 | Disable accounts the attacker used or may have used, and any administrator account acting unusually. Disable, do not delete: the account is evidence. Do it from a device that is not affected. | Managed IT service provider; Incident manager approves | Within [[1 hour]] |
C6 | Preserve evidence before anything is wiped (IM-07): photograph the ransom note, keep the first infected device on and isolated, and ask the monitoring provider to preserve and export its logs (Evidence preservation). | Incident manager, with the security monitoring provider | Before any rebuild |
C7 | Search for the same attack elsewhere. Share what is known (file names, accounts, addresses) with the monitoring provider and the hosting provider, and have them look at every site and hosted service and block what they find. | Security monitoring provider; cloud hosting provider | Within [[1 hour]], then at every update |
Guidance — delete before approval
Switching a device off is the most common mistake in the first hour. It is right only when there is no other way to stop it spreading, for example no way to disconnect it. Record why if you do.
C3 and C4 matter as much as C1: attackers look for the backups first. A backup that can be reached from the affected network is not safe until it has been checked.
Site isolation steps
How to cut one site off quickly and safely, prepared in advance for each site, so the incident manager can order it and the managed IT service provider can do it at any hour without working it out under pressure. Complete one row per site and test it at least once a year.
Site | Where it is cut, and how | Who can do it out of hours | What keeps running | Last tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Warehouse 1 (EXAMPLE) | [[e.g. disable the site's link on the core firewall; or unplug the uplink in the site comms room]] | [[name and number; backup name and number]] | [[e.g. warehouse systems on their separate network; dispatch]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] |
Warehouse 2 (EXAMPLE) | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] |
Warehouse 3 (EXAMPLE) | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] |
[[Head office or other site]] | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[…]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] |
For every site, in this order:
# | Step | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
S1 | Confirm the order to isolate, and the time, with the incident manager. Note it in the case log. | Managed IT service provider | On the order |
S2 | Cut the site's office network off from the other sites, the hosted services and the internet at the point in the table. Leave devices on. | Managed IT service provider | Within [[15 minutes]] of the order |
S3 | Where the site's operational network (for example warehouse systems) is separated from its office network, confirm the separation holds and nothing crosses it. If it is not separated, contain the least disruptive way first: block what crosses between the two, and disable affected accounts. Before cutting off anything people depend on for safety or essential operations, bring in its service owner and specialists, and decide with them how far to go; keep containing meanwhile. | Managed IT service provider; Incident manager decides, with the service owner and specialists | With S2 |
S4 | Keep one managed path in for the responders, if needed, from a clean device only. | Managed IT service provider | With S2 |
S5 | Tell the site manager what has happened and what still works, using the staff holding message (CT-03). | Incident manager | Within [[30 minutes]] |
S6 | Confirm to the incident manager that the site is isolated, and ask the monitoring provider to confirm no traffic leaves it. | Managed IT service provider; Security monitoring provider | When done |
Guidance — delete before approval
These steps are what post-incident review action PIA-04 asks for: “Add site isolation steps for each warehouse to the Ransomware Response Playbook”, owner Information Security Manager, due 25 Sep 2026. In the example it is still open, and past its due date as at 30 Sep 2026. The rows above are placeholders until it is done: replace them with each site's real isolation point and contacts, test them, and record the date.
If your sites share one flat network, the isolation point is the internet link and the links between sites. Separating each site's office network from its operational systems (as the example did after its incident) makes S3 simple.
Decision tree
Answer these in order at the start, then again at every update: the answers change as the investigation learns more. Record each answer, who gave it and when, in the case log.
D1 Is it still spreading? (RS.MI-01; IM-08)
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Severity 1. Widen the isolation, the least disruptive way that stops it: the next site or segment, any shared administrator systems, the link to hosted services. Before stopping anything people depend on for safety or essential operations, bring in its service owner and specialists. Decide whether a customer-facing service must stop to protect it (see Who decides). Ask for outside responders if the technical responders cannot keep up. |
No | Confirm it: no new encryption, alerts or attacker activity for [[2 hours]] across every site and hosted service. Record the time of containment: “The incident can no longer spread or cause new harm, even though systems may not yet be restored.” |
Not yet known | Treat it as Yes. |
Who decides | Isolation: incident manager, at once and least disruptive first. Stopping a customer-facing service: executive incident lead; the incident manager may do it first where waiting would let the harm spread, and reports it at once. Where people depend on the service for safety or essential operations, its service owner and specialists are brought in first. |
D2 Has data been taken (double extortion)? (GDPR 4(12), 33(1))
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Run the Personal Data Breach Response Playbook alongside this one. The GDPR clock (RD-06) runs from awareness. Severity 1 if data was taken at scale. Plan the customer notice (CT-04) and, where individuals are at high risk, the communication to them (CT-08). Record what was taken, for whom, and how you know. |
No | Record the evidence that it was not taken: logs of data leaving the network, reviewed for the whole period the attacker was inside. Encrypted personal data that could not be used for a time is still a personal data breach (availability): the Data Protection Officer assesses it and it is always recorded (RD-08). |
Not yet known | Treat it as possible until the logs have been reviewed. Signs: a claim with sample files, large transfers out, archive or file transfer tools where they should not be. |
Who decides | Incident manager, with the Data Protection Officer |
D3 Are the backups intact and clean? (RC.RP-03; IM-10)
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Restore (D4). Use copies from before the earliest sign of the attacker, not just before the encryption. Check each copy's integrity, and scan it in an isolated place before it goes back on the network. |
No | Rebuild from clean images and recover data from other sources (the hosting provider, suppliers, paper records). Tell the executive incident lead at once: recovery will take longer and the restore order (Recovery criteria) matters more. Engage outside responders if needed (decision rights: incident manager, within the [[retainer]]; above it the executive incident lead). |
Not yet known | Do not restore until they have been checked. Never restore from a copy that the attacker could have reached without checking it. |
Who decides | Backup service provider checks; Incident manager decides |
D4 For each system: do we know the attacker's route in and every change it made to this system? (RS.MI-02; RC.RP-05)
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Restore data onto the patched system, change its credentials, and check it before reconnecting. |
No | Rebuild it from a clean image, then restore only data. Where the attacker had administrator rights, rebuild the systems it controlled, starting with the sign-in directory. |
Who decides | Managed IT service provider recommends; Incident manager decides; the system owner tests |
D5 Is there an extortion or ransom demand? (IM-08)
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Do not reply, and do not contact the attacker. Nobody makes contact except through a channel the board has decided on, [[e.g. a specialist appointed through the insurer and Legal]]. Keep the note, contact details and any deadline as evidence (Evidence preservation). Legal starts the sanctions check. Tell the insurer (RD-15) and report the crime (RD-16). Plan recovery as if nothing will be paid. |
No | Continue recovery. A demand can still arrive later, sometimes by email to managers or customers: brief the communications lead and the service desk to pass it straight to the incident manager. |
Who decides | Paying a ransom or extortion demand: only the board or its equivalent. Never before legal advice (including sanctions checks), the insurer's view and a report to law enforcement. The plan assumes we do not pay. |
D6 Has the crime been reported, and the insurer told? (Reporting duties RD-15, RD-16)
Answer | What to do |
|---|---|
Yes | Record the reference numbers in the case log. Follow the insurer's instructions on its panel responders before engaging anyone else, where the policy requires it. |
No | Tell the insurer as the policy requires (RD-15: [[as the policy requires, often within 48 hours]]) and report the crime (RD-16: [[as soon as practical for suspected crime]]). Neither waits for the investigation to finish. |
Who decides | Executive incident lead; Legal makes the crime report |
Role actions by phase
Who does what. The placeholders are replaced with names and a deputy for each; out-of-hours numbers go in the contact list of the plan.
Role | Who | In this playbook |
|---|---|---|
Incident manager | [[e.g. Information Security Manager, with a named deputy]] | Runs the playbook; decides isolation, least disruptive first, bringing in the service owner and specialists before stopping a service people depend on for safety or essential operations; keeps the case log and the decision log; runs the reporting screen. |
Executive incident lead | [[e.g. Chief Operating Officer, with a named deputy]] | Decides on stopping customer services, reports and outside messages; leads the crisis team; takes the ransom question to the board. |
Technical responders | [[IT operations, the managed IT provider and the security monitoring provider]] | Isolate, investigate, eradicate, rebuild and restore. |
Data Protection Officer | [[or the privacy lead where no DPO is appointed]] | Decides with the incident manager whether data was taken (D2); advises on GDPR reports. |
Legal | [[in-house or external counsel]] | Sanctions check; crime report; privilege and contracts; advice to the board on any demand. |
Communications lead | [[e.g. Head of Marketing and Communications]] | Staff, customer and media messages from the approved templates only. |
Board | [[the board chair, or the equivalent where there is no board]] | The only body that may decide on a ransom; told of Severity 1 within the matrix's time. |
The Tier 1 suppliers this playbook calls on, from the example (Third-Party Security Risk Management pack). Their contracts should oblige them to help (TP-10).
Provider | What it does in an incident (P06 contract) | Your provider and incident line |
|---|---|---|
Managed IT service provider (EXAMPLE SUP-001) | Isolates networks and systems, rebuilds devices, restores from backup | [[name; 24-hour incident number; contract reference]] |
Security monitoring provider (EXAMPLE SUP-006) | Detects and alerts around the clock; supplies logs and analysis | [[name; 24-hour incident number; contract reference]] |
Backup service provider (EXAMPLE SUP-011) | Confirms backup integrity and supports restoration | [[name; 24-hour incident number; contract reference]] |
Cloud hosting provider (EXAMPLE SUP-002) | Protects and restores the hosted ordering platform | [[name; 24-hour incident number; contract reference]] |
Email and office software provider (EXAMPLE SUP-005) | Suspends accounts, removes mail rules and supplies mailbox audit logs | [[name; 24-hour incident number; contract reference]] |
Contain
Goal: nothing new is encrypted or taken, on any site. Starts at declaration with C1 to C7; ends when D1 is answered No.
# | Action | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
K1 | Keep one list of every affected device, account, site and service, with when it was found and isolated; update it at every update. | Incident manager | From declaration |
K2 | Ask the hosting provider to check the hosted ordering platform for the same signs, protect it, and take a copy that the attacker cannot reach. | Incident manager; cloud hosting provider | Within [[1 hour]] |
K3 | Watch every site and hosted service for the indicators found, and raise any new sighting at once. | Security monitoring provider | Round the clock until closure |
K4 | Decide whether any customer-facing service must stop to protect it or other customers. | Executive incident lead | At each update while D1 is Yes |
K5 | Brief the crisis team and the executive incident lead (CT-02 Executive and board briefing). | Incident manager | Every update |
K6 | Send the staff holding message (CT-03 Staff holding message), including: do not discuss the incident outside, and report any contact from the attacker. | Communications lead | When staff notice the effects |
K7 | List the personal data held on the affected systems, and whose it is, for D2. | Data Protection Officer | Within [[4 hours]] |
K8 | Start the sanctions check if a demand has been made; agree with the insurer how any contact will be handled. | Legal | On a demand |
Eradicate
Goal: the attacker has no way back in. Starts when contained; must be complete before any system reconnects.
# | Action | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Find the way in: the phishing email, remote access or unpatched system the attacker used first. Close it. For a phishing email, have it removed from every mailbox and its sender and attachment blocked. | Security monitoring provider; managed IT service provider; email and office software provider for email | Before reconnection |
E2 | Find and remove what the attacker left behind: new accounts, scheduled tasks, remote access tools, changed settings on the sign-in directory. | Managed IT service provider | Before reconnection |
E3 | Reset credentials in this order, from clean devices: administrator accounts, service accounts, remote access, backup system, then every user at affected sites. End all signed-in sessions. | Managed IT service provider | Before reconnection |
E4 | Patch the weakness used, and any other critical weakness on the affected systems. | Managed IT service provider | Before reconnection |
E5 | Confirm to the incident manager that E1 to E4 are done, with no new attacker activity since containment. | Security monitoring provider | Before recovery starts |
Recover
Goal: services back, in order, on systems known to be clean. Starts when E5 is confirmed.
# | Action | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
V1 | Agree the restore order (Recovery criteria) and the target time for each service. | Executive incident lead | When recovery starts |
V2 | Check each backup's integrity before it is used (IM-10), and record the check. | Backup service provider | Before each restore |
V3 | Rebuild or restore each system as D4 decides; apply the changed credentials; turn on endpoint protection and monitoring before reconnection. | Managed IT service provider | In restore order |
V4 | Test the service and confirm in writing that it works. | System owner | Before it returns to users |
V5 | Reconnect in stages, under closer monitoring, one site or service at a time. | Managed IT service provider; security monitoring provider | After V4 |
V6 | Start the monitoring period (7 days for Severity 1 and Severity 2) and tell staff what is back (CT-03 Staff holding message), customers where affected (CT-04 Customer notice). | Incident manager; communications lead | When the last service returns |
V7 | At closure, send CT-10 All-clear and thank-you. | Communications lead | At closure |
Evidence preservation
IM-07 (Security Incident Management Policy): Evidence must be preserved before systems are wiped or rebuilt, unless waiting would let the harm spread; who handled it, and when, must be recorded.
With ransomware, evidence is the only way to know how the attacker got in, what it touched and whether data left. It is also what the insurer, law enforcement and any authority will ask for.
Evidence | How to preserve it | Who | Before |
|---|---|---|---|
The ransom note | Photograph it on screen with the time visible; copy the note file to a clean, write-protected store. Do not open any link or address in it. | Incident manager | Any clean-up |
Sample encrypted files | Copy [[5]] encrypted files, and where possible the same files from backup, to the evidence store. Some can later be decrypted by public tools. | Managed IT service provider | Rebuild |
Memory of the first infected device | Where possible, a responder captures memory with a forensic tool while the device is on and isolated. Do not do this without training. | Managed IT service provider or outside responder | Switch-off |
The first infected device | Keep it on and isolated, labelled and locked away. If it must be reused, take a full disk image first. | Managed IT service provider | Rebuild |
Logs | Export and keep: endpoint protection, firewall, remote access, sign-in directory, email, backup console and hosted services. Extend retention on each source for the incident. | Security monitoring provider | Retention runs out |
The attacker's messages | Keep every email, note, chat address and deadline; record, but never follow, links. | Incident manager; Legal | Any contact |
The decision log | Every decision, who took it and when, with the reason, in the case log (A09). | Incident manager | Throughout |
For each item, record who collected it, when, from where, and where it is kept (the chain of custody). Keep the evidence store off the affected network.
Guidance — delete before approval
If law enforcement or the insurer's responders will investigate, ask them before wiping anything. Rebuilding a device without a disk image first is the usual way evidence is lost.
Communications and regulatory triggers
Run the reporting screen of the Incident Triage & First-Hour Assessment Procedure within 4 hours of declaration (IM-06): its NIS2, GDPR, DORA questions, and the contract and insurance questions. Record each answer and its reason even when no report is made.
Reports ransomware usually triggers
Duty | Report and deadline | To | When this incident triggers it |
|---|---|---|---|
RD-01 NIS2 | Early warning: within 24 hours of awareness | [[CSIRT or competent authority]] | We are an essential or important entity and the ransomware has caused or could cause severe disruption of our services or financial loss (NIS2). Encryption across more than one device or site usually meets this. |
RD-02 NIS2 | Incident notification: within 72 hours of awareness | [[CSIRT or competent authority]] | As RD-01, updating the early warning with an initial assessment of severity and impact. |
RD-04 NIS2 | Final report: within one month of the incident notification (a progress report then, and the final report within one month of handling, if still ongoing) | [[CSIRT or competent authority]] | As RD-01; describe the root cause, the measures taken and any effect on other countries. |
RD-05 NIS2 | Notice to recipients of our services: without undue delay, where appropriate | Customers whose service is likely to be adversely affected | A significant incident likely to affect the services we provide to customers. |
RD-06 GDPR | Notification to the supervisory authority: without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of awareness; later only with reasons for the delay | [[lead supervisory authority]] | Personal data was taken, or was encrypted and unavailable, and the breach is likely to result in a risk to individuals. Both are breaches: confidentiality, and availability. |
RD-07 GDPR | Communication to the individuals affected: without undue delay | The data subjects | Personal data was taken and the risk to individuals is high (the Personal Data Breach Response Playbook). |
RD-08 GDPR | Breach record: for every personal data breach, notified or not | Kept by us; shown to the authority on request | Every personal data breach, including an availability breach that is not notified. |
RD-10 DORA | Initial notification: within 4 hours of classifying the incident as major, and no later than 24 hours after awareness; where it is classified as major only after those 24 hours, within 4 hours of that classification | [[financial competent authority]] | Financial entities only: the incident is classified as major (the screen's DORA question). The intermediate report (RD-11) and final report (RD-12) follow on their own clocks. |
RD-13 DORA | Notice to clients: without undue delay | Clients whose financial interests are affected | As RD-10, where clients' financial interests are affected. |
RD-14 Contract | Notice to customers under contract: [[as each contract requires]] | [[customers with a notification clause]] | A customer contract requires notice of an incident affecting its service or data. |
RD-15 Insurance | Notice to the cyber insurer: [[as the policy requires, often within 48 hours]] | [[insurer or broker incident line]] | Always, where a cyber policy is held. The insurer may require its own responders. |
RD-16 Law enforcement | Crime report: [[as soon as practical for suspected crime]] | [[national cybercrime reporting service]] | Always: ransomware and extortion are crimes. |
Guidance — delete before approval
A report is never held back to avoid a deadline (decision rights: “Report to an authority”). Send what is known on time and follow up; the early warning and the initial notification are meant to be incomplete.
Name your authorities in the placeholders: the CSIRT or competent authority, the lead supervisory authority, and where you are a financial entity, the financial competent authority.
Messages
IM-09 (Security Incident Management Policy): Only the communications lead may speak for the organisation about an incident outside it, using the approved templates; nobody else may talk to the media or post about an incident.
Template | Audience | Approver | Use it in this incident when |
|---|---|---|---|
CT-01 Incident alert to the response team | Incident manager, responders, executive incident lead | Incident manager | At declaration, to the response team. |
CT-02 Executive and board briefing | Executive incident lead, crisis team, board chair | Incident manager | At each update for Severity 1 and 2, and to the board chair for Severity 1. |
CT-03 Staff holding message | All staff, or the affected site or team | Executive incident lead | As soon as staff notice: systems down, PCs taken away. Tell them what to do, what not to say, and to report contact from the attacker. |
CT-04 Customer notice | Customers whose service or data is affected | Executive incident lead | When a customer's service or data is affected, or a contract requires it. Say what happened, what it means for them and what we are doing; do not guess. |
CT-05 Supplier notice and request for help | Suppliers involved in the incident or the recovery | Incident manager | When a supplier must act (restore, investigate) or be warned because the attacker may reach it through us. |
CT-09 Media holding statement | Press and public | Executive incident lead | When the incident is, or is about to be, public, including when the attacker publishes or contacts the press. |
CT-10 All-clear and thank-you | Everyone told earlier | Executive incident lead | At closure. |
Guidance — delete before approval
Never say in public whether a ransom has been or will be paid, and never describe how the attacker got in until it is fixed.
Attackers sometimes write to customers or the press to add pressure. Brief the communications lead and the service desk to route any such contact straight to the incident manager.
Recovery criteria
IM-10 (Security Incident Management Policy): A system must not return to normal service until the recovery criteria are met, and backups must be checked for integrity before they are restored.
# | Recovery criterion (IM-10) | How to confirm it here | Confirmed by |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | The cause is understood well enough that the same route in is closed. | The way in (E1) is closed, what the attacker left (E2) is removed, and the monitoring provider has seen no activity since containment (E5). | Incident manager; security monitoring provider |
2 | Backups or rebuild images were checked for integrity before they were used. | Each backup copy used dates from before the earliest sign of the attacker, was checked for integrity, and was scanned before use (D3, V2). The check is recorded. | Backup service provider |
3 | Restored systems are patched, scanned and monitored, with credentials changed where they could have been taken. | Each system is rebuilt or restored as D4 decided, patched, running endpoint protection and monitored. Credentials were reset in the order of E3. | Managed IT service provider |
4 | The system owner has tested the service and confirms it works. | The system owner has tested the service and confirmed in writing that it works (V4). | System owner |
5 | The monitoring period has started: [[7]] calendar days of closer watching for Severity 1 and 2 before closure. | The monitoring period of 7 calendar days has started, with the monitoring provider watching for the indicators found. | Incident manager |
Restore order
Restore the foundations first, then the critical services in the order the executive incident lead confirms at V1. The example's critical services are those of the Third-Party Security Risk Management pack, in the order its continuity plan sets (Cyber Resilience & Recovery pack, RR-08: the shortest recovery time objective first), with the Tier 1 suppliers each depends on.
Order | Service | Depends on (P06 Tier 1 IT and finance suppliers) | Target time to restore, and after an attack |
|---|---|---|---|
First | Foundations: network, sign-in directory, backup system, endpoint protection and monitoring | [[your suppliers]] | [[12 hours]] (an estimate) (EXAMPLE) |
1 | Warehouse dispatch (EXAMPLE) | Managed IT service provider; ERP software provider (hosted); Security monitoring provider; Warehouse management system provider; Network connectivity provider | [[8 hours]]. After an attack about 17 hours: its workaround carries the gap (EXAMPLE) |
2 | Online ordering (EXAMPLE) | Managed IT service provider; Cloud hosting provider; Security monitoring provider; Backup service provider; Network connectivity provider | [[24 hours]]. After an attack about 108 hours: past its maximum of 48, so it cannot recover in time (EXAMPLE) |
3 | Customer contact (EXAMPLE) | Email and office software provider | [[24 hours]]. After an attack about 12 hours (EXAMPLE) |
4 | Payments (EXAMPLE) | Payment service provider | [[24 hours]]. Restored by its provider: no rebuild of ours (EXAMPLE) |
5 | Finance and payroll (EXAMPLE) | Managed IT service provider; Cloud hosting provider; ERP software provider (hosted); Backup service provider; Payroll bureau | [[48 hours]]. After an attack about 12 hours (EXAMPLE) |
Then | Everything else, by business priority | [[target]] |
Guidance — delete before approval
Set the order and target times in advance, with the owners of each service, in your business continuity plan. The example's plan restores the shortest recovery time first, so warehouse dispatch, which must be back within 8 hours, comes first; the executive incident lead may set another order and record why (Cyber Resilience & Recovery pack, RR-08). Its own risk R-01, “Ransomware takes online ordering offline for more than 2 days”, is about online ordering.
After a ransomware attack every service waits for the foundations, so some targets cannot be met: the times after an attack are the Cyber Resilience & Recovery pack's, and its continuity plan says what carries each service until it returns.
Closing the incident
Closure: “Recovery criteria met, the monitoring period passed without recurrence, and the case log complete.” The incident manager closes the case only when all five criteria are met, the monitoring period of 7 days has passed without the attack returning, every report due has been made, and the case log is complete.
Post-incident actions
IM-11 (Security Incident Management Policy): Every Severity 1 and 2 incident must have a post-incident review within 10 working days of closure; its actions must have owners and due dates, and the risks it touches must be reassessed (P05 RM-10).
# | Action | Owner | When |
|---|---|---|---|
P1 | Hold the post-incident review with the Post-Incident Review Template, within 10 working days of closure. Cover: the way in, why it spread, how fast each step of this playbook ran, the backups, and the reports. | Head of Information Security | Within 10 working days of closure |
P2 | Reassess the risks the incident touched in the Information Security Risk Register (Information Security Risk Management pack), at least R-01 “Ransomware takes online ordering offline for more than 2 days” and R-04 “Ransomware spreads from warehouse office PCs to warehouse systems” in the example. P05 rule RM-10: “A trigger forces reassessment of the risks it touches within [[10]] working days.” | Each risk's owner | Within the RM-10 window |
P3 | Give every review action an owner and a due date, and track it in the case and action log until done. | Head of Information Security | At the review |
P4 | Update this playbook: the site isolation steps, contacts, triggers, restore order and anything that was slow. | Incident manager | Within [[30 days]] |
P5 | Send the NIS2 final report (RD-04) and the DORA final report (RD-12) where they apply; their content comes from the review. | Incident manager | By their deadlines |
P6 | Exercise this playbook at least once a year, and after every Severity 1 incident review the plan (IM-12). | Head of Information Security | Yearly |
Worked example — ransomware at Warehouse 2
EXAMPLE, not part of the playbook. The organisation is the one used throughout the pack: a wholesale distributor with about 900 staff, three warehouses and an online ordering service that takes 60% of its orders, an important entity under NIS2 in its Member State, and not a financial entity, so DORA's reporting duties do not apply. Replace every name, time and figure with your own.
Case | INC-2026-014 |
|---|---|
What happened | The security monitoring provider alerted on encryption activity on one office PC at Warehouse 2. It had spread to 14 office PCs on that site's office network before the site was cut off. Ordering and dispatch were not affected. |
Category and severity | IC-01; Severity 1: it spread to more than one device (Severity 1, Spread: “Malware or an attacker spreading, or administrator-level access to core systems”). |
Roles | Incident manager: Information Security Manager. Executive incident lead: Chief Operating Officer. Reported by: Security monitoring provider (SUP-006). |
Root cause | A phishing attachment opened by a warehouse office user whose account had local administrator rights. That site's office network was not yet separated, so it spread to 14 PCs. |
Screen: NIS2 | Significant: capable of severe operational disruption; early warning, notification and final report made |
Screen: GDPR | Personal data breach (availability of shipping records on the PCs); restored from backup, no sign of data taken; unlikely to result in a risk, so recorded and not notified |
Screen: DORA | Not applicable: not a financial entity |
Which step ran when
Times from the case log; “+h:mm” is time after declaration at 08:25 on 12 Aug 2026.
Time | After declaration | What happened | Who | Playbook step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
12 Aug, 07:50 | 35 min before declaration | Monitoring alert: encryption activity on one office PC at Warehouse 2 | Security monitoring provider (SUP-006) | Trigger T-02 (encryption activity) |
12 Aug, 08:05 | 20 min before declaration | Triage starts (out of hours: within 60 minutes) | IT service desk | Triage, before the playbook (IM-02) |
12 Aug, 08:25 | +0:00 | Declared Severity 1, category IC-01; reporting clocks start | Incident manager | First hour 1 and 2: case opened, Severity 1 (spreading) |
12 Aug, 08:40 | +0:15 | Executive incident lead told | Incident manager | First hour 3: escalate |
12 Aug, 08:55 | +0:30 | Decision: cut Warehouse 2's office network off from all other networks (the incident manager's decision; the executive incident lead agreed, as it stopped office work at the site) | Incident manager | C2 and D1: isolate the site |
12 Aug, 09:10 | +0:45 | Warehouse 2 office network isolated | Managed IT provider (SUP-001) | C2: site isolation steps |
12 Aug, 09:20 | +0:55 | Crisis team convened | Executive incident lead | First hour 3: escalate |
12 Aug, 11:30 | +3:05 | Reporting screen complete: NIS2 significant; GDPR breach to assess; DORA not applicable | Incident manager, Data Protection Officer | First hour 5: reporting screen (IM-06) |
12 Aug, 11:45 | +3:20 | Cyber insurer told | Executive incident lead | D6: RD-15 |
12 Aug, 12:20 | +3:55 | Board chair told | Executive incident lead | First hour 3: escalate |
12 Aug, 13:50 | +5:25 | Contained: 14 PCs isolated, no activity on any other site | Incident manager | D1 answered No: contained |
12 Aug, 15:40 | +7:15 | NIS2 early warning submitted | Incident manager | RD-01 |
12 Aug, 17:10 | +8:45 | Crime reported | Legal | D6: RD-16 |
12 Aug, 19:30 | +11:05 | Eradicated: the phishing email removed from every mailbox, its sender and attachment blocked, and the affected user's and Warehouse 2 administrator passwords reset | Managed IT provider (SUP-001), email provider (SUP-005) | Eradicate E1 to E3 |
13 Aug, 14:00 | +29:35 | Office work resumes on rebuilt PCs; backups checked before restoring | Managed IT provider (SUP-001), backup provider (SUP-011) | D3, D4 and Recover: backups checked, PCs rebuilt |
14 Aug, 10:00 | +2 days | GDPR assessment: unlikely to result in a risk; recorded, not notified | Data Protection Officer | D2 and RD-06: breach assessed |
14 Aug, 14:00 | +2 days | NIS2 incident notification submitted | Incident manager | RD-02 |
21 Aug, 09:00 | +9 days | Closed after 7 days' monitoring without recurrence | Incident manager | Recovery criterion 5: monitoring period ended |
27 Aug, 10:00 | +15 days | Post-incident review held | Head of Information Security | Post-incident actions (IM-11) |
11 Sep, 12:00 | +30 days | NIS2 final report submitted | Incident manager | RD-04 |
What the timings show
- Contained 6 hours after detection, the measure the board sees (IMM-01).
- Office work lost for about 29 h 35 min from declaration, on rebuilt PCs with backups checked before restoring (recovery criterion 2).
- Warehouse 2's office network was isolated 45 minutes after declaration and 15 minutes after the incident manager's decision to do it (decision rights: “Isolate a system, site or account”). The site isolation steps (PIA-04) are meant to shorten both.
- Closed on 21 Aug 2026 after the 7-day monitoring period; reviewed 4 working days after closure (IM-11: within 10).
Reports and notices made
Duty | Report | Made | Deadline | After declaration | On time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RD-01 | NIS2 early warning | 12 Aug 2026, 15:40 | 13 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 7 h 15 min | Yes |
RD-02 | NIS2 incident notification | 14 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 15 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 2 days | Yes |
RD-04 | NIS2 final report | 11 Sep 2026, 12:00 | 14 Sep 2026, 23:59 | 30 days | Yes |
RD-15 | Insurance: Insurer's incident line; its panel firm was not needed | 12 Aug 2026, 11:45 | [[as the policy requires, often within 48 hours]] | 3 h 20 min | No legal deadline |
RD-16 | Law enforcement: Reported to [[the national cybercrime reporting service]] | 12 Aug 2026, 17:10 | [[as soon as practical for suspected crime]] | 8 h 45 min | No legal deadline |
Recovery never depended on the attacker: the site was cut off, the backups were intact (D3 Yes) and the office PCs were rebuilt rather than cleaned (D4 No), so the plan's assumption that we do not pay held. The Data Protection Officer decided that no data had been taken (D2 No) and recorded the availability breach without notifying it (RD-08). (EXAMPLE)
Review actions
From the review on 27 Aug 2026. Status as at 30 Sep 2026.
Action | What | Owner | Due | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PIA-01 | Remove local administrator rights from all office PCs | Head of IT | 31 Oct 2026 | In progress |
PIA-02 | Finish separating the warehouse networks from the office network at all three sites (P05 TA-04; two were still joined on 12 Aug) | Head of IT | 11 Sep 2026 | Done 11 Sep 2026 |
PIA-03 | Reassess the risk of ransomware spreading to warehouse systems (P05 R-04) | Head of Logistics | 26 Aug 2026 | Done 20 Aug 2026 |
PIA-04 | Add site isolation steps for each warehouse to the Ransomware Response Playbook | Information Security Manager | 25 Sep 2026 | Open (past due) |
PIA-05 | Give the monitoring provider's out-of-hours analysts a direct line to the incident manager | Head of Information Security | 15 Sep 2026 | Done 10 Sep 2026 |
PIA-01 is the board's follow-up in the Board Cybersecurity Reporting pack's board story; PIA-02 is the Information Security Risk Management pack's treatment action TA-04, which separated the warehouse networks; PIA-04 is the site isolation steps under First-hour actions in this playbook, still to be completed. (EXAMPLE)
Tailoring notes
Guidance — delete before approval
Small organisation: the incident manager and the executive incident lead are still two different people: one runs the response, the other answers for its business impact. Name deputies from outside IT if you need to, for example the managing director as executive incident lead. The decision on any ransom still belongs to the board or the owners, never to one manager. Keep at least one backup copy offline or immutable, test a restore every [[quarter]], and keep a printed copy of this playbook and the contact list somewhere that does not depend on the network. Your managed IT provider may do every technical step: agree in advance who calls whom out of hours.
Regulated entity: an essential or important entity under NIS2 treats most ransomware as a possible significant incident and watches the RD-01 and RD-02 clocks from awareness. A DORA financial entity classifies the incident under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772 (Articles 8 and 9) and, when it is major, reports on RD-10 to RD-13: the initial notification within 4 hours of classifying the incident as major, and no later than 24 hours after awareness; where it is classified as major only after those 24 hours, within 4 hours of that classification, then the intermediate and final reports, and notice to clients whose financial interests are affected. Add your financial competent authority to Communications and regulatory triggers and a classification step to the first hour. Under the GDPR the Data Protection Officer decides with the incident manager whether an availability breach is notifiable.
Outsourced IT or a managed service provider: where a provider runs your network and devices, C1 to C7, the site isolation steps and most of eradicate and recover are its work. Check its contract obliges it to notify you and help in an incident (the Third-Party Security Risk Management pack's incident clauses), that it can act out of hours within the times above, and that the backup copies it keeps are out of reach of its own administrator accounts. If ransomware reaches you through the provider's own tools, treat it as a supplier incident as well (IC-10) and cut the provider's remote access until it is cleared.
Cyber insurance: if you hold a policy, read its incident conditions now. Many require notice within a set time and the use of the insurer's panel responders; engaging others first can affect cover.
Delete this section before approval.
Framework references
These references show where this document supports an external framework. They indicate relevance only and do not reproduce the text of any standard. Editions referenced: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 incl. Amd 1:2024; NIST CSF 2.0; Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690; Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR); Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024/1772 and 2025/301, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/302.
Framework | Reference | Supported by |
|---|---|---|
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.26 — Response to information security incidents | First-hour actions, Decision tree, Role actions by phase |
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.28 — Collection of evidence | Section 6: evidence preserved with chain of custody |
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.29 — Information security during disruption | Role actions by phase; Recovery criteria |
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 8.13 — Information backup | C3, C4, D3 and V2: backups protected and checked |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RS.MI-01 — “Incidents are contained” | Containment C1 to C7, site isolation steps, D1 |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RS.MI-02 — “Incidents are eradicated” | Eradicate E1 to E5, D4 |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RC.RP-03 — “The integrity of backups and other restoration assets is verified before using them for restoration” | D3 and V2: backups verified before restoration |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RC.RP-05 — “The integrity of restored assets is verified, systems and services are restored, and normal operating status is confirmed” | V3 to V5 and recovery criteria 3 and 4 |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RS.AN-07 — “Incident data and metadata are collected, and their integrity and provenance are preserved” | Section 6: incident data collected with integrity and provenance |
NIST CSF 2.0 | GV.SC-08 — “Relevant suppliers and other third parties are included in incident planning, response, and recovery activities” | Section 5: suppliers in the response |
NIST CSF 2.0 | RS.CO-02 — “Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents” | Section 7: stakeholders notified |
NIS2 — Directive (EU) 2022/2555 | Article 23(3) — an incident is significant if it “has caused or is capable of causing severe operational disruption of the services or financial loss for the entity concerned”, or has affected or is capable of affecting others “by causing considerable material or non-material damage” | Section 7: when ransomware is a significant incident |
NIS2 — Directive (EU) 2022/2555 | Article 23(4) — an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident; an incident notification within 72 hours; an intermediate report on request; a final report not later than one month after the incident notification (or a progress report, then a final report within one month of handling, if still ongoing) | RD-01 to RD-04 |
GDPR — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 | Article 4(12) — “personal data breach” means “a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed” | D2: data taken or made unavailable is a personal data breach |
GDPR — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 | Article 33(1) — notify the supervisory authority “without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it”, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons; a later notification gives reasons for the delay | RD-06 |
DORA — Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 | Article 19(4) — an initial notification, an intermediate report, and a final report when the root cause analysis is complete and actual impact figures are available | RD-10 to RD-12 for financial entities |
DORA — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772 | Article 8 — an incident is major where it affects critical services and either meets the data-loss threshold in Article 9(5)(b) or meets two or more of the other materiality thresholds | Tailoring notes: classifying a major ICT-related incident |
Definitions
Term | Meaning in this playbook |
|---|---|
Awareness | The moment the reporting clocks start: the time the incident is declared, as recorded in the case log, unless the record shows we had reasonable certainty earlier, in which case the earlier time. |
Clean image | A known-good copy of an operating system and software, kept apart from the network, used to rebuild a device from scratch. |
Closure | Recovery criteria met, the monitoring period passed without recurrence, and the case log complete. |
Containment | The incident can no longer spread or cause new harm, even though systems may not yet be restored. |
Double extortion | Ransomware where the attacker also copies data before encrypting it, and threatens to publish it unless paid. |
Endpoint protection | The security software on PCs and servers that detects and blocks malicious behaviour and reports to the monitoring provider. |
Incident | An event, declared by the incident manager, that has compromised, or threatens to compromise, the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of our data or services, and needs a managed response. |
Indicators | The traces an attack leaves that can be searched for elsewhere: file names, addresses, accounts, tools. |
Isolate | Cut a device, site or network off from every other network while leaving it switched on, so it cannot spread harm and its evidence survives. |
Major ICT-related incident | DORA's term, for financial entities only: an ICT-related incident with a high adverse impact on systems that support critical or important functions, as tested by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772. |
Offline or immutable backup | A backup copy that cannot be changed or deleted from the network it protects: disconnected, or locked for a set period by the backup system. |
Personal data breach | GDPR's term: a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure of, or access to, personal data. |
Ransomware | Malicious software that encrypts files or systems so they cannot be used, followed by a demand for payment. Category IC-01 in the matrix. |
Rebuild | Wipe a device and install it again from a clean image, then restore only data. Used where the attacker may have changed the system itself. |
Restore | Put data or a system back from a backup copy that has been checked for integrity. |
Sanctions check | Legal's check that no payment or other dealing would benefit a person, group or country under sanctions. |
Significant incident | NIS2's term: an incident that has caused or could cause severe operational disruption or financial loss to us, or considerable damage to others. Reported to the authority on NIS2's clock. |