Incident Response Readiness Checklist
Confirms contacts, tooling access, log availability, retainers and delegated authority are in place before an incident occurs.
Available soon
- Format
- Excel
- Size
- 59 KB
- Length
- 9 sheets
- Version
- 1.0
- Updated
What's inside
What changed
- 1.0
Published.
Preview
The workbook's sheets as you will receive them, with its example rows and the values its formulas calculate. Highlighted [[text]] is for you to replace; rows marked EXAMPLE are for you to delete. Wide sheets scroll sideways. The cover, document control and changelog sheets are in the file.
Instructions
How to use this workbook
| Step | What to do |
|---|---|
| 1 | Check at least once a year, after every Severity 1 incident and after a change of people, suppliers or systems that the plan relies on (IM-12). Do it with the Incident Response Plan and the contact list open. |
| 2 | For each item, look at the evidence, not at what people say: open the contact list, test the out-of-hours number, sign in with the emergency account. Record where the evidence is in 'Evidence reference'. |
| 3 | Enter the owner (the person who keeps the item true), the date you checked, and the result from the list: Pass, Fail, or N/A. A Fail or N/A needs a reason. The Check column prompts for anything missing. |
| 4 | Items marked Critical are the ones without which the first hours of a serious incident would fail. A Fail on any of them makes the status Not ready: fix it first. Put every Fail on an action list with an owner and a due date — the Incident Case & Action Log's Actions sheet, or your own tracker. |
| 5 | Read the Summary: counts by area and overall, and the readiness status. Then complete the sign-off: the person who checked, the Head of Information Security, and the executive incident lead who accepts the result. |
| 6 | Add items of your own on the blank rows at the foot of the checklist, with an ID in the same form (RC-area-number) and an area from the list. |
| 7 | To clear the EXAMPLE, delete the contents of the 'Row' column and of every yellow column; the items stay. |
Legend
Yellow cells are inputs. Everything else is calculated or fixed — do not overwrite formulas.
| EXAMPLE | Rows marked EXAMPLE in the first column show how a completed row looks. Delete them before approval. |
EXAMPLE: a wholesale distributor with about 900 staff, three warehouses and an online ordering service that takes 60% of its orders, an important entity under NIS2 in its Member State; not a financial entity, so DORA's reporting duties do not apply. Its self-check as at 2026-09-30, the quarter of its ransomware incident (INC-2026-014). The plan was exercised on 2026-03-18. One item fails: the ransomware playbook still lacks the site isolation steps the review asked for (PIA-04, overdue). DORA's item is N/A.
Tailoring — small organisation: keep every Critical item; the others can be met simply (one contact list, one playbook for everything but ransomware and payment fraud). N/A is a reason, not a way to skip: say why in the reason column.
Tailoring — regulated financial entity: DORA replaces NIS2's reporting for financial entities. Answer RC-REP-03 instead of RC-REP-01, add items for the classification criteria of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772 and for reporting major incidents to the management body (DORA Article 17(3)), and test RD-10 to RD-13 in your exercise.
Tailoring — IT run by a managed service provider: most technical items (tooling access, logs, backups, monitoring) are met by the provider. Ask it for the evidence — a restore test report, its log retention, its out-of-hours escalation to your incident manager — and record it here; its word alone is not a Pass.
Checklist
The checks, by area. Yellow columns are yours; the Check column calculates. 12 rules (IM-01 to IM-12) are in the Security Incident Management Policy.
| Row | Item ID | Area | Item | Pass when | Rule tested | Critical | Evidence reference | Owner | Date checked | Result | Reason (for Fail or N/A) | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXAMPLE | RC-GOV-01 | Governance and plan | The Security Incident Management Policy is approved and in date | Approved by executive management, published to staff, and its review date has not passed. | IM-01 to IM-12 | No | Policy approval record and intranet page | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-GOV-02 | Governance and plan | The Incident Response Plan is approved, in date and reviewed after the last Severity 1 incident | Approved; review date not passed; reviewed after every Severity 1 incident (IM-12). | IM-12 | Yes | Plan reviewed at the INC-2026-014 post-incident review, 27 Aug 2026 | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-GOV-03 | Governance and plan | The Incident Classification, Severity & Escalation Matrix is tailored and in use | Money thresholds are your own; responders set severity and category from it at declaration. | IM-04 | No | Matrix approved; severity and category set in every case in the log | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-GOV-04 | Governance and plan | Decision rights are written down and known | Who may isolate, stop a customer-facing service, report to an authority, speak outside, engage outside help and decide on a ransom demand is written and known to the people named (6 decisions). | IM-08 | Yes | Incident Response Plan, decision rights table | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-GOV-05 | Governance and plan | Incidents are reported to executive management every quarter | Incidents by severity, reports made on time and overdue review actions reported each quarter. | IM-12 | No | Quarterly summary from the Incident Case & Action Log | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-01 | Roles and contacts | A named incident manager and deputy | Both named, trained in the plan, and one of them reachable at any hour. | IM-03 | Yes | Plan roles table; on-call rota | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-02 | Roles and contacts | A named executive incident lead and deputy | Both named and reachable out of hours; the incident manager can reach one of them within 30 minutes. | IM-05 | Yes | Out-of-hours numbers tested; INC-2026-014 lead told 15 minutes after declaration | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-03 | Roles and contacts | The crisis team can be convened within the hour | Members named; a way to convene them within 60 minutes, including a meeting line that does not depend on our own systems. | IM-05 | No | Crisis team list; conference bridge details | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-04 | Roles and contacts | The incident contact list is complete, checked and held offline | Responders, executives, board chair, Legal, the Data Protection Officer, insurer, authorities and key suppliers, checked in the last [[3]] months and kept on paper or phones as well as online. | IM-05 | Yes | Contact list, checked this quarter | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-05 | Roles and contacts | Responders have the tools and access they need at any hour | Emergency administrator accounts work and are stored safely; the managed IT provider and the security monitoring provider can isolate a device, site or account on the incident manager's word. | IM-08 | Yes | Emergency account test; INC-2026-014 site isolated by the managed IT provider | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-ROL-06 | Roles and contacts | A way to talk if email and chat are down or watched | An agreed channel outside our own systems for the response team, known to its members. | IM-09 | No | Plan: out-of-band channel | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-DET-01 | Detection and reporting | Everyone knows how to report a suspected event | One reporting route, in induction and reminded at least yearly; the no-blame rule is stated. | IM-01 | No | Awareness training records; intranet reporting page | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-DET-02 | Detection and reporting | Reports reach someone who can act, at any hour | A report or alert out of hours reaches the incident manager directly, in time to start triage within 60 minutes. | IM-02 | Yes | Monitoring provider's direct line to the incident manager in place since 10 Sep 2026 (PIA-05) | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-DET-03 | Detection and reporting | Security monitoring covers the systems that matter | Alerts from endpoints, email, identity and internet-facing systems go to a monitored queue around the clock. | IM-02 | No | Monitoring service scope (SUP-006) | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-TRI-01 | Triage and classification | Triage starts within the limit | Every report this quarter triaged within 30 minutes in working hours and 60 minutes outside them. | IM-02 | No | Incident Case & Action Log: triage on time for all 5 cases | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-TRI-02 | Triage and classification | Every incident is opened with a case number, manager, category and severity | The case log shows all four recorded at declaration. | IM-03 | No | Incident Case & Action Log, Cases sheet | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-TRI-03 | Triage and classification | Events closed at triage are recorded with a reason | Events and near misses closed without declaration are in the service desk with the reason. | IM-02 | No | Service desk security queue | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-TRI-04 | Triage and classification | Severity is reviewed at every update | Updates record the severity; any lowering has a recorded reason. | IM-04 | No | Case log: INC-2026-017 lowered from Severity 2 to 3 at 15:20, reason recorded | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-01 | Reporting duties | We know whether NIS2 applies to us, and how to report | Our entity status recorded; the CSIRT or authority, its reporting route and our account for it known and tested. | IM-06 | Yes | Entity status: an important entity under NIS2 in its Member State; authority portal account tested | Legal | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-02 | Reporting duties | We can meet GDPR's 72 hours | The Data Protection Officer is on the contact list; the supervisory authority's form is known; a breach record is kept for every breach, notified or not. | IM-06 | Yes | Breach record; INC-2026-016 notified within 72 hours | Data Protection Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-03 | Reporting duties | DORA reporting is ready, if we are a financial entity | Classification criteria, the competent authority's template and the 4-hour and 24-hour clocks built into the screen. | IM-06 | No | — | Legal | 30 Sep 2026 | N/A | Not a financial entity, so DORA's reporting duties do not apply. | OK |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-04 | Reporting duties | Contract notification duties are known | A list of customers and partners whose contracts require notice of an incident, with the time each allows. | IM-06 | No | Contract notification list | Legal | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-05 | Reporting duties | The cyber insurer's notice conditions are known | Policy notice period, incident line and panel firms on the contact list. | IM-06 | No | Insurer told 11:45 on the day of INC-2026-014 | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-REP-06 | Reporting duties | The reporting screen is done on time, and reports are made on time | Screen complete within 4 hours of declaration; every report due this quarter made by its deadline. | IM-06 | No | Incident Case & Action Log, Reports sheet: 4 of 4 on time | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-PLB-01 | Playbooks | A playbook for each category that needs one | Ransomware Response Playbook, Business Email Compromise Response Playbook and Personal Data Breach Response Playbook approved and known to responders. | IM-12 | No | Three playbooks approved | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-PLB-02 | Playbooks | Playbooks carry the lessons of the last review | Every review action that changes a playbook is done by its due date. | IM-11 | No | PIA-04: "Add site isolation steps for each warehouse to the Ransomware Response Playbook" | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Fail | PIA-04 is open, due 25 Sep 2026: 5 days overdue at 30 Sep 2026. | Put on the action list |
| EXAMPLE | RC-PLB-03 | Playbooks | Payment changes are checked by a call-back | A request to change bank details is confirmed by calling a number already on file, never one in the request. | IM-12 | No | Accounts payable procedure; INC-2026-015 stopped by the call-back | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-PLB-04 | Playbooks | Personal data breaches are assessed with the Data Protection Officer | The personal data breach playbook sets how risk to individuals is judged and who decides on notification. | IM-06 | No | Personal Data Breach Response Playbook | Data Protection Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EVD-01 | Evidence and logging | Logs are kept long enough and responders can get them | Logs of key systems, email and identity kept for at least [[90 days]]; responders and suppliers can produce them on request. | IM-07 | No | Log retention settings; INC-2026-017 mailbox audit log produced | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EVD-02 | Evidence and logging | Evidence is preserved before systems are wiped | The playbooks say how to capture a disk, memory or mailbox before rebuilding, and who records the handling. | IM-07 | No | Ransomware Response Playbook, evidence steps | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EVD-03 | Evidence and logging | System clocks agree | Servers, devices and cloud services use the same time source, so a timeline can be built. | IM-07 | No | Time synchronisation settings | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EVD-04 | Evidence and logging | Every incident has a case log with its timeline and decisions | The case log holds each case's timeline, decisions and who took them. | IM-03 | No | Incident Case & Action Log: INC-2026-014 timeline, 20 entries | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-BKP-01 | Backups and recovery | Backups of critical systems cannot be reached by an attacker | Offline or immutable copies of critical systems and data, restored in a test within the last 12 months. | IM-10 | Yes | Backup provider report (SUP-011); restore during INC-2026-014 | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-BKP-02 | Backups and recovery | Backups are checked before they are restored | The playbook and the backup provider check integrity before any restore. | IM-10 | No | INC-2026-014: "Office work resumes on rebuilt PCs; backups checked before restoring" | Head of IT | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-BKP-03 | Backups and recovery | Recovery criteria are written down | The 5 criteria for returning to normal service, and the 7-day monitoring period before closure, are in the plan. | IM-10 | No | Incident Response Plan, recovery criteria | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-COM-01 | Communications | Approved message templates are ready | CT-01 to CT-10 approved, with the authority notification contents. | IM-09 | No | Incident Communications Template Set | Communications lead | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-COM-02 | Communications | Only the communications lead speaks outside | Staff know not to talk to the media or post about an incident; the communications lead and a deputy are named. | IM-09 | No | Staff handbook; awareness training | Communications lead | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-SUP-01 | Suppliers | Key suppliers' incident roles are agreed | The 5 Tier 1 suppliers the plan relies on know their role, must tell us of an incident within [[24]] hours and must help us. | IM-01 | No | Contract clauses; roles for SUP-001, SUP-006, SUP-011, SUP-002, SUP-005 | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-SUP-02 | Suppliers | Supplier out-of-hours contacts are on the contact list | Each key supplier's out-of-hours incident contact is listed and was checked. | IM-05 | Yes | Contact list includes the monitoring provider's out-of-hours line (PIA-05, done 10 Sep 2026) | Information Security Manager | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-SUP-03 | Suppliers | Outside help can be called in at once | A retainer with an incident response firm, or the insurer's panel, with the authority to engage it agreed. | IM-08 | No | Insurer's panel on the contact list; in INC-2026-014 its panel firm was not needed | Chief Operating Officer | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EXE-01 | Exercises and learning | The plan was exercised in the last 12 months | An exercise of the plan (not a live incident) within the last 12 months, with its lessons recorded. | IM-12 | Yes | Exercise report, 18 Mar 2026 (6 months ago) | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EXE-02 | Exercises and learning | Every Severity 1 and 2 incident was reviewed on time | A post-incident review within 10 working days of closure. | IM-11 | No | Reviews: INC-2026-014 27 Aug 2026; INC-2026-016 24 Sep 2026 | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK | |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EXE-03 | Exercises and learning | Review actions are owned and on track | Every action has an owner and a due date; none more than 30 days overdue. | IM-11 | No | Incident Case & Action Log, Actions sheet | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | PIA-04 5 days overdue, within the 30-day limit; PIA-01 in progress, due 31 Oct 2026; PIA-06 in progress, due 15 Oct 2026. | OK |
| EXAMPLE | RC-EXE-04 | Exercises and learning | Risks an incident touched were reassessed | Each risk the review names was reassessed in the risk register. | IM-11 | No | P05 risk R-04 reassessed 20 Aug 2026 | Head of Information Security | 30 Sep 2026 | Pass | OK |
Summary
Summary and sign-off
The results by area and overall, the readiness status, and the sign-off. Everything above the sign-off is calculated.
EXAMPLE: the example organisation's self-check, as at 2026-09-30. Clear the EXAMPLE answers to use your own.
Results by area
| Area | Items | Pass | Fail | N/A | Not assessed | Critical items failed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance and plan | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Roles and contacts | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Detection and reporting | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Triage and classification | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Reporting duties | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Playbooks | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready, with actions |
| Evidence and logging | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Backups and recovery | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Communications | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Suppliers | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| Exercises and learning | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Ready |
| All areas | 44 | 42 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Ready, with actions |
Status — Not ready: a Critical item failed. Incomplete: an item is not assessed. Ready, with actions: only non-critical items failed. Ready: every item passed or is N/A with a reason. Items without an Item ID are not counted.
Other counts
| Count | Items |
|---|---|
| Critical items in the checklist | 12 |
| Fail or N/A without a reason | 0 |
Sign-off
| Role | Name | Date | Signature or approval reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Checked by | [[Name]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] | [[Reference]] | ||||
| Reviewed by (Head of Information Security) | [[Name]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] | [[Reference]] | ||||
| Result accepted by (Executive incident lead) | [[Name]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] | [[Reference]] | ||||
| Next check due | [[Within 12 months, or after the next Severity 1 incident]] | [[YYYY-MM-DD]] | |||||
Lists
| Result | YesNo | Area |
|---|---|---|
| Pass | Yes | Governance and plan |
| Fail | No | Roles and contacts |
| N/A | Detection and reporting |
Triage and classification
Reporting duties
Playbooks
Evidence and logging
Backups and recovery
Communications
Suppliers
Exercises and learning
Definitions
Definitions
| Term | Meaning in this workbook |
|---|---|
| Readiness | Being able to respond well to an incident before it happens: the plan, people, contacts, access, evidence, backups, reporting routes and suppliers in place and tested. |
| Pass | The evidence shows the item meets its 'Pass when' criterion today. |
| Fail | The evidence shows it does not, or there is no evidence. Give the reason and put it on the action list. |
| N/A | The item does not apply to you, for example DORA for an organisation that is not a financial entity. Give the reason. |
| Critical item | One without which the first hours of a serious incident would fail. A Fail on any makes the status Not ready. |
| Rule tested | The rule of the Security Incident Management Policy the item checks (IM-01 to IM-12). |
| Exercise | A planned rehearsal of the plan: a discussion of a scenario, a test of a part (a restore, a call tree), or a full simulation. A live incident is not an exercise. |
| Retainer | An agreement with an incident response firm, or the insurer's panel, to help at short notice on agreed terms. |
| Decision rights | Who may take the decisions with business impact in an incident, as the Incident Response Plan sets them. |
| NIS2 | Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, as transposed in your Member State. Applies to essential and important entities. |
| GDPR | The General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Applies whenever personal data is affected. |
| DORA | The Digital Operational Resilience Act, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, with its Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024/1772 and 2025/301. Applies to financial entities only; for them its reporting replaces NIS2's. |
| CSIRT | Computer security incident response team: the national team (or the competent authority) that receives NIS2 reports. |
| EXAMPLE | A worked example: a wholesale distributor with about 900 staff, three warehouses and an online ordering service that takes 60% of its orders, as at 2026-09-30. Clear the EXAMPLE answers before use. |
Framework References
Framework references
These references indicate relevance only and do not reproduce the text of any standard.
| Framework | Reference | Supported by |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.24 — Information security incident management planning and preparation | The checklist as a whole: incident management planned and prepared, roles and procedures in place |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.29 — Information security during disruption | Backups and recovery, and the crisis team: security maintained during disruption |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 8.13 — Information backup | RC-BKP items: backups protected and restore tested |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Annex A 5.5 — Contact with authorities | RC-REP items: the authorities to report to, and how, known in advance |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | ID.IM-04 — “Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved” | Governance and plan, exercises: the incident response plan established, communicated, maintained and improved |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | GV.SC-08 — “Relevant suppliers and other third parties are included in incident planning, response, and recovery activities” | RC-SUP items: suppliers included in incident planning, response and recovery |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | RC.RP-03 — “The integrity of backups and other restoration assets is verified before using them for restoration” | RC-BKP-02: backups checked before they are restored |
| NIS2 — Directive (EU) 2022/2555 | Article 21(2)(b) — the cybersecurity risk-management measures include “incident handling” | The checklist as a whole: incident handling in place as a risk-management measure |
| NIS2 — Directive (EU) 2022/2555 | Article 21(2)(c) — “business continuity, such as backup management and disaster recovery, and crisis management” | Backups and recovery, crisis team: backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management |
| DORA — Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 | Article 17(3) — early warning indicators; procedures to log, categorise and classify incidents; roles for each incident type; communication plans; reporting major incidents to senior management and the management body; response procedures | Tailoring for financial entities: roles, communication plans, reporting to the management body and response procedures in place |
Editions referenced: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 incl. Amd 1:2024; NIST CSF 2.0; Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690; Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR); Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024/1772 and 2025/301, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/302