Independent thinking. Informed defence.

CISO Times

Intelligence for the people behind the defence.

The CISO Decision Brief

Patch Deployment Ring & Maintenance Window Plan

Defines pilot and production rings, maintenance windows and rollback criteria per system group.

Available soon

Format
Excel
Size
74 KB
Length
12 sheets
Version
1.0
Updated

What's inside

What changed

  1. 1.0

    Published.

Changes across this pack

Preview

The workbook's sheets as you will receive them, with its example rows and the values its formulas calculate. Highlighted [[text]] is for you to replace; rows marked EXAMPLE are for you to delete. Wide sheets scroll sideways. The cover, document control and changelog sheets are in the file.

Instructions

How to use this workbook

StepWhat to do
1Calendar: enter the year and month of the cycle. The release day (the second Tuesday) and every step's date calculate from the Monthly Patch Cycle Operating Procedure's offsets. Change an offset only together with that procedure.
2Rings: name who is in each ring and enter the number of devices. The pilot covers every hardware model and every business application in use (RG-0); the early ring is spread across sites and departments and never more than half of any one team (RG-1). The share and its check calculate.
3Groups and Windows: set each window's day, counted from the release day, and its hours. The check says whether a patch installed in that window is verified inside a Priority 2 deadline (PM-07). Then list your server and appliance groups and the window each uses.
4Systems: one row per server and appliance from the asset inventory (PM-01): its class, criticality, exposure, group, redundant partner, owner and patch owner. The window, the pair check (GR-2, GR-4), the internet-facing check (GR-5) and the Priority 2 check calculate. Fix every red check before the cycle starts.
5Rollback: set the two thresholds, then agree the criteria for each ring and group with the pilot users and system owners before its first deployment (PM-08), and enter who agreed and when.
6Review the plan at every cycle's preparation step (CY-01), and whenever a system is added, a pair is broken or a supplier changes its certification dates. Keep each version as the record.
7To clear the EXAMPLE, delete the contents of the 'Row' column and of every yellow cell on Rings, Systems and Rollback, and replace the groups on Groups and Windows.

Legend

Yellow cells are inputs. Everything else is calculated or fixed — do not overwrite formulas.

EXAMPLERows marked EXAMPLE in the first column show how a completed row looks. Delete them before approval.

Rule PM-06: "End-user devices must be patched in three rings, pilot, early and broad, each starting only when the one before has passed its rollback criteria. Servers are patched by group, and the two members of a redundant server pair never in the same window. The two members of a high-availability appliance pair are patched in the same window, one at a time (GR-4)."

Rule PM-07: "Every server and appliance must have a maintenance window, agreed by its system owner, at least once a month, and timed so that a Priority 2 patch released on the release day can be installed and verified inside its deadline."

Rule PM-08: "Every ring and server group must have rollback criteria agreed before deployment. A rollback stops the next ring until the cause is known, and the patch is re-planned inside its deadline or deferred under PM-14."

EXAMPLE: a wholesale distributor with about 900 staff, three warehouses and an online ordering service that takes 60% of its orders. Its plan for the first cycle under the standard, September 2026: 640 devices in three rings, 11 servers and 6 appliances in 5 groups. The warehouse management system (SG-W) has one database server and runs round the clock, so its only window is the Sunday change window, after its supplier has certified the patch.

Tailoring — small organisation: With fewer than [[50]] end-user devices, the three rings PM-06 requires may be two: the pilot (RG-0), observed for [[2]] working days and still covering every hardware model and business application in use, then every other device. This is the only tailoring exception to PM-06. Keep the forced restart, and every server still has a group and a window.

Tailoring — IT run by a managed service provider: give the provider this plan as the contract's schedule. Its tool runs the rings; you keep the windows agreed with your system owners, and ask for the management tool's report and the scan (PM-10).

Tailoring — regulated financial entity: DORA's technical standards ask for restart, rollback and recovery procedures (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774, Article 8(2)(c)(iii)) and for patches to be tested and deployed with deadlines (Article 10(4)). The Rollback sheet and the windows are that record.

Calendar

Calendar: this cycle and the next twelve release days

Yellow cells are yours; everything else calculates. Days are calendar days from the release day (the Monthly Patch Cycle Operating Procedure).

Settings

SettingValueNotes
Year of the cycle2026EXAMPLE: the first cycle under the standard.
Month of the cycle (1 to 12)9
Release day (calc): the second Tuesday8 Sep 2026The largest vendors' release day. Every date below counts from it.
Days from release to first detection (for planning)1The scanner usually finds a missing patch the day after release. The deadline still runs from the actual first detection (P01 VM-08).
Priority 2 deadline (calendar days)14P01's, unchanged (PM-02). Not yours to change here.
Working days from a window to verification1The rescan and the owner's check, after the window (PM-10).
A Priority 2 patch released on the release day is due (calc)23 Sep 2026Release day + first detection + the Priority 2 deadline. Every window must be verified by then (PM-07).

This cycle, step by step

Step IDDays from release dayDate (calc)Day (calc)StepWhat, and who
CY-01-53 Sep 2026ThuPrepareConfirm the pilot list, book the windows with the system owners, ask suppliers who certify patches for their dates, and clear last month's stragglers. Who: IT Operations Manager.
CY-0208 Sep 2026TueReview the releasesRead each vendor's advisory, rate each fix with the P01 model (exploited? internet-facing? severity? criticality?), and route it: monthly cycle, expedited or emergency (PM-03). Who: IT Operations Manager, with the Head of Information Security.
CY-0319 Sep 2026WedApprove and start the pilotApprove the month's pre-approved standard change, check the patches' integrity, and deploy to the pilot ring and the test servers (PM-04, PM-05). Who: Head of IT approves; IT operations deploy.
CY-04311 Sep 2026FriPilot go or no-goAfter [[2]] working days, check the rollback criteria with the pilot users; go, or roll back and re-plan (PM-08). Who: IT Operations Manager.
CY-05614 Sep 2026MonEarly ringDeploy to the early ring. Who: IT operations.
CY-06816 Sep 2026WedBroad ring and Window ARelease to the broad ring, with users able to postpone the restart until the forced restart date; patch server group A and its appliance pairs in Window A. Who: IT operations; system owners check their services.
CY-071220 Sep 2026SunWindow BPatch server group B, its appliances, and the systems with a Sunday change window whose supplier has certified the patch. Who: IT operations; suppliers where they must attend.
CY-081422 Sep 2026TueForced restartDevices still waiting for a restart are restarted (PM-09). Who: Device management.
CY-091523 Sep 2026WedVerify and chaseConfirm installation, restarts and service checks; ask for the targeted rescans (P01 VM-13); list every asset still missing a patch, reschedule it inside its deadline or request a deferral before the deadline passes (PM-10, PM-14). Who: IT Operations Manager.
CY-10Monthly reportReportThe month's measures go to the security and IT leadership team in the monthly reporting cycle (PM-19, P11 RL-1). Who: IT Operations Manager.

CY-06 and CY-07 take their days from Window A and Window B on the Groups and Windows sheet. The forced restart (CY-08) is PM-09's: users may postpone a restart until then, and no later.

The next twelve release days

MonthRelease dayPilot starts (CY-03)Early ring (CY-05)Window AWindow BForced restart (CY-08)Verify and chase (CY-09)Priority 2 due
1 Sep 20268 Sep 20269 Sep 202614 Sep 202616 Sep 202620 Sep 202622 Sep 202623 Sep 202623 Sep 2026
1 Oct 202613 Oct 202614 Oct 202619 Oct 202621 Oct 202625 Oct 202627 Oct 202628 Oct 202628 Oct 2026
1 Nov 202610 Nov 202611 Nov 202616 Nov 202618 Nov 202622 Nov 202624 Nov 202625 Nov 202625 Nov 2026
1 Dec 20268 Dec 20269 Dec 202614 Dec 202616 Dec 202620 Dec 202622 Dec 202623 Dec 202623 Dec 2026
1 Jan 202712 Jan 202713 Jan 202718 Jan 202720 Jan 202724 Jan 202726 Jan 202727 Jan 202727 Jan 2027
1 Feb 20279 Feb 202710 Feb 202715 Feb 202717 Feb 202721 Feb 202723 Feb 202724 Feb 202724 Feb 2027
1 Mar 20279 Mar 202710 Mar 202715 Mar 202717 Mar 202721 Mar 202723 Mar 202724 Mar 202724 Mar 2027
1 Apr 202713 Apr 202714 Apr 202719 Apr 202721 Apr 202725 Apr 202727 Apr 202728 Apr 202728 Apr 2027
1 May 202711 May 202712 May 202717 May 202719 May 202723 May 202725 May 202726 May 202726 May 2027
1 Jun 20278 Jun 20279 Jun 202714 Jun 202716 Jun 202720 Jun 202722 Jun 202723 Jun 202723 Jun 2027
1 Jul 202713 Jul 202714 Jul 202719 Jul 202721 Jul 202725 Jul 202727 Jul 202728 Jul 202728 Jul 2027
1 Aug 202710 Aug 202711 Aug 202716 Aug 202718 Aug 202722 Aug 202724 Aug 202725 Aug 202725 Aug 2027

Book these windows with the system owners a year ahead. A vendor that releases on another day, or out of turn, follows the same steps from its own release (PM-03).

Rings

The 3 rings for end-user devices (PM-06). Each starts only when the one before has passed its rollback criteria. Yellow columns are yours.

RowRing IDRingWho is in itStarts whenObserved forCycle stepStarts this cycle (calc)Target shareDevicesShare of devices (calc)Check (calc)Covers every hardware model and business application? (pilot)
EXAMPLERG-0PilotThe IT team's own devices, test servers, and [[2]] pilot users from each department and site: about [[5]]% of devices, covering every hardware model and every business application in useThe day after the release review[[2]] working daysCY-039 Sep 20265%325%About the targetYes
EXAMPLERG-1EarlyAbout [[25]]% of devices, spread across every site and department, and never more than half of any one teamWhen the pilot has passed its rollback criteria[[2]] working daysCY-0514 Sep 202625%16025%About the targetN/A
EXAMPLERG-2BroadEvery other deviceWhen the early ring has passed its rollback criteriaUntil the forced restart dateCY-0616 Sep 202670%44870%About the targetN/A
Devices in the rings (calc)640
A ring is about its target when its share is within this many percentage points of it2%

A group of end-user devices that receives a patch at the same stage. Pilot first, then early, then broad, each starting only when the one before has passed its rollback criteria. The pilot is observed for [[2]] working days before the early ring starts (PM-05).

Groups and Windows

Maintenance windows and server groups

Each window is a day counted from the release day. Each group of servers or appliances uses one window (GR-1). Yellow cells are yours; the dates and checks calculate.

Maintenance windows

WindowNameWhenDays from release dayDate this cycle (calc)Verified by (calc)Priority 2 check (calc)Used for
MW-AWindow AThe Wednesday of the week after the release day, [[20:00 to 23:00]]816 Sep 202617 Sep 2026Inside a Priority 2 deadlineServer group A, and the appliance pairs whose group uses it (both members, one at a time, GR-4)
MW-BWindow BThe Sunday after Window A, [[02:00 to 06:00]]1220 Sep 202621 Sep 2026Inside a Priority 2 deadlineServer group B, the appliances whose group uses it, and systems with a Sunday change window
MW-EEmergency windowAny time the emergency change sets (PM-11)Any time (PM-11)Any time (PM-11)Priority 1 patches, and expedited patches with no window inside their deadline

Server and appliance groups

GroupWindowWhat is in itSystems (calc)Date this cycle (calc)Days from release (calc)Pairs split wrongly (calc)
SG-AMW-AOne domain controller, one file server and one ordering platform web server, with the servers whose loss nobody notices for a night516 Sep 202680
SG-BMW-BThe other member of each pair420 Sep 2026120
SG-WMW-BWarehouse management system: Sunday change window only, after the supplier has certified the patch, with the supplier's engineer attending the restart220 Sep 2026120
NW-1MW-AFirewall pair, both in Window A, the earliest (GR-5): the standby firewall first, then the other once the standby is back in service (GR-4)216 Sep 202680
NW-2MW-BCore switches and the wireless controller: Sunday window, because the warehouses run round the clock; one warehouse at a time420 Sep 2026120

Rules for groups and windows

RuleWhat it requires
GR-1Every server belongs to one group, and every group to one maintenance window.
GR-2The two members of a redundant server pair (domain controllers, clustered nodes, load-balanced web servers) are in different groups with different windows, so one is always running and a faulty patch reaches only one.
GR-3The first server group is patched only after the pilot ring and the test servers have passed their rollback criteria.
GR-4The two members of a high-availability appliance pair (firewalls, remote access gateways) are in the same group and patched in the same window, one at a time: the standby first, the other only after the first is back in service and has passed its service check. A pair never runs two firmware versions for longer than the window.
GR-5Internet-facing systems are in the earliest group their redundancy allows, because their deadlines are the shortest (P01).
GR-6A system whose supplier must certify each patch has its own group, whose window falls after the certification date the contract sets.

Systems

One row per server and appliance (PM-01). End-user devices are in the Rings. Yellow columns are yours; the checks calculate.

RowSystemRoleAsset classCriticalityExposureGroupWindow (calc)Days from release (calc)Redundant partnerPartner's group (calc)Pair check (calc)Internet-facing check (calc)Priority 2 check (calc)Supplier certifies each patch?System ownerPatch owner
EXAMPLEDC-01Domain controllerAC-2CriticalInternalSG-AMW-A8DC-02SG-BDifferent groups (GR-2)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEFS-01File serverAC-2HighInternalSG-AMW-A8FS-02SG-BDifferent groups (GR-2)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEAPP-01Application server (label printing)AC-2StandardInternalSG-AMW-A8No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEPRN-01Print serverAC-2StandardInternalSG-AMW-A8No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEWEB-01Ordering platform web server (hosted, P06 SUP-002)AC-2CriticalInternet-facingSG-AMW-A8WEB-02SG-BDifferent groups (GR-2)Earliest window its redundancy allows (GR-5)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoChief Operating OfficerIT Operations Manager (operating system); the ordering platform team (application)
EXAMPLEDC-02Domain controllerAC-2CriticalInternalSG-BMW-B12DC-01SG-ADifferent groups (GR-2)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEFS-02File serverAC-2HighInternalSG-BMW-B12FS-01SG-ADifferent groups (GR-2)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEAPP-02Application server (intranet and reports)AC-2StandardInternalSG-BMW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEWEB-02Ordering platform web server (hosted, P06 SUP-002)AC-2CriticalInternet-facingSG-BMW-B12WEB-01SG-ADifferent groups (GR-2)Earliest window its redundancy allows (GR-5)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoChief Operating OfficerIT Operations Manager (operating system); the ordering platform team (application)
EXAMPLEWMS-APP-01Warehouse management system application serverAC-2CriticalInternalSG-WMW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineYesHead of LogisticsIT Operations Manager, with the supplier (P06 SUP-010)
EXAMPLEWMS-DB-01Warehouse management system database serverAC-2CriticalInternalSG-WMW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineYesHead of LogisticsIT Operations Manager, with the supplier (P06 SUP-010)
EXAMPLEFW-01Firewall (internet edge)AC-3CriticalInternet-facingNW-1MW-A8FW-02NW-1One at a time in the window (GR-4)Earliest window its redundancy allows (GR-5)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEFW-02Firewall (internet edge)AC-3CriticalInternet-facingNW-1MW-A8FW-01NW-1One at a time in the window (GR-4)Earliest window its redundancy allows (GR-5)Inside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLESW-W1Core switch, Warehouse 1AC-3HighInternalNW-2MW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLESW-W2Core switch, Warehouse 2AC-3HighInternalNW-2MW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLESW-W3Core switch, Warehouse 3AC-3HighInternalNW-2MW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager
EXAMPLEWLC-01Wireless controllerAC-3HighInternalNW-2MW-B12No redundant pairInside a Priority 2 deadlineNoHead of ITIT Operations Manager

Rollback

Rollback criteria, and who agreed them

What stops a ring or a window and starts a rollback (PM-08). Agree the criteria for every ring and group before its first deployment; a rollback stops the next ring or group until the cause is known.

Thresholds

ThresholdValue
A ring stops when more than this share of its devices fail to install after two attempts (RB-3)2%
A server's service check, this many minutes after the restart (RB-4, VF-03)30

Rollback criteria

CriterionWhat stops the ring or windowApplies to
RB-1Any pilot device fails to start, loses its network connection or cannot sign in after the patch.RG-0
RB-2A business application on the pilot test list fails to start or to do its main task.RG-0
RB-3More than [[2]]% of a ring's devices fail to install the patch after two attempts.RG-0, RG-1, RG-2
RB-4A server's service check fails [[30]] minutes after the restart and cannot be fixed inside the window.SG-A, SG-B, SG-W, NW-1, NW-2
RB-5The vendor withdraws or replaces the patch, or publishes a known issue that affects a system or application in use.RG-0, RG-1, RG-2, SG-A, SG-B, SG-W, NW-1, NW-2

When a criterion is met

StepWhat to do
1Stop the next ring or group at once; nothing further is deployed until the cause is known.
2Roll back the affected systems inside the window: uninstall the patch, or restore the snapshot or backup taken before it.
3Tell the Head of Information Security the same day, because the vulnerability is open again.
4Re-plan the patch inside its P01 deadline, with the vendor's fix or workaround; if that cannot be done, request a deferral before the deadline passes (PM-14).

Criteria agreed for each ring and group

Ring or groupCriteria that applyAgreed byAgreed onFirst deployment this cycle (calc)Check (calc)
RG-0RB-1, RB-2, RB-3, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the pilot users3 Sep 20269 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
RG-1RB-3, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the pilot users3 Sep 202614 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
RG-2RB-3, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the pilot users3 Sep 202616 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
SG-ARB-4, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the system owners3 Sep 202616 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
SG-BRB-4, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the system owners3 Sep 202620 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
SG-WRB-4, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the system owners3 Sep 202620 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
NW-1RB-4, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the system owners3 Sep 202616 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)
NW-2RB-4, RB-5IT Operations Manager, with the system owners3 Sep 202620 Sep 2026Agreed before deployment (PM-08)

Lists

AssetClassIDAssetClassCriticalityExposureYesNoYesNoNA
AC-1End-user devicesCriticalInternet-facingYesYes
AC-2ServersHighInternalNoNo
AC-3Network and security appliancesStandardN/A
AC-4Business applications
AC-5Cloud and software services the provider patches

Definitions

Definitions

TermMeaning in this workbook
RingA group of end-user devices that receives a patch at the same stage. Pilot first, then early, then broad, each starting only when the one before has passed its rollback criteria.
Server groupA group of servers or appliances patched in the same maintenance window. The two members of a redundant server pair are always in different groups; the two members of a high-availability appliance pair are in the same group and patched one at a time.
Maintenance windowAn agreed, recurring time when a system may be patched and restarted, approved by its system owner.
Release dayThe day a vendor publishes its regular patches. For the largest operating system and office software vendors it is the second Tuesday of the month; other vendors release monthly, quarterly or whenever a fix is ready.
RollbackRemoving a patch, or restoring the system to its state before the patch, because the patch broke something.
Monthly cycleThe routine that takes each month's releases from review through testing, deployment in rings and windows, and verification, on fixed days counted from the release day.
Days from release dayCalendar days counted from the vendor's release day, which is day 0. The dates on the Calendar add them to this month's release day.
Priority 2 checkWhether a patch installed in this window is verified inside a Priority 2 deadline: the window's day plus the days to verification, no later than the day of first detection plus 14 days (PM-07). Priority 1 patches never wait for a window: they take the emergency route (PM-11).
Pair checkTwo servers that back each other up (domain controllers, clustered or load-balanced nodes) must be in different groups, so one is always running (GR-2). The two members of an appliance pair are patched one at a time in the same window (GR-4).
Internet-facing checkAn internet-facing system goes in the earliest window its redundancy allows, because its deadlines are the shortest (GR-5). The second member of a pair passes when its partner is in the earliest window.
Internet-facingReachable from the internet, as the vulnerability management standard (P01) defines it.
AC-1 End-user devicesLaptops, desktops and tablets: their operating system, office software, browsers, document readers and other installed applications. Delivered: Three rings (RG-0 to RG-2), automatically through device management; the restart forced on the cycle's restart date.
AC-2 ServersServer operating systems, databases and server applications, on premises and in the organisation's own cloud subscriptions. Delivered: By server group in its maintenance window; one member of a redundant pair at a time.
AC-3 Network and security appliancesFirewalls, remote access gateways, switches, wireless controllers and storage appliances. Delivered: Firmware one high-availability member at a time in the window; internet-facing devices first.
AC-4 Business applicationsLine-of-business applications, web applications and the components and libraries they are built on. Delivered: In the application's own window, after the supplier has certified any operating system patch it depends on.
AC-5 Cloud and software services the provider patchesSoftware as a service, and hosting where the provider patches the platform beneath what the organisation runs. Delivered: The provider's own process; the organisation checks the provider's notices every month and patches its clients, agents and connectors.
Forced restartThe date, [[14]] days after the release day, when device management restarts every device still waiting for one (PM-09).
(calc)A column or cell the workbook calculates. Do not type or paste over it.
PM-nn, GR-n, RB-n, MW-x, CY-nnRules, group rules, rollback criteria, windows and cycle steps of the Patch Management Standard and the Monthly Patch Cycle Operating Procedure.
EXAMPLEA worked example: a wholesale distributor with about 900 staff, three warehouses and an online ordering service that takes 60% of its orders, September 2026. Delete before use.

Framework References

Framework references

These references indicate relevance only and do not reproduce the text of any standard.

FrameworkReferenceSupported by
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Annex A 8.8 — Management of technical vulnerabilitiesThe plan as a whole: technical vulnerabilities fixed through planned, tested deployment
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Annex A 8.32 — Change managementWindows, rings and rollback criteria: patches deployed as controlled changes
NIST CSF 2.0PR.PS-02 — “Software is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk”Rings and windows: software kept maintained on a fixed timetable
NIS2 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690Article 1 — lays down the technical and methodological requirements of the Article 21(2) measures, and further specifies when an incident is significant, for DNS service providers, TLD name registries, cloud computing, data centre and content delivery network providers, managed service and managed security service providers, providers of online marketplaces, online search engines and social networking services platforms, and trust service providersWho the Implementing Regulation binds: the digital providers its Article 1 names. For others it shows what a regulator expects
NIS2 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690Annex, point 6.6.1 — “The relevant entities shall specify and apply procedures, coherent with the change management procedures referred to in point 6.4.1 as well as with vulnerability management, risk management and other relevant management procedures, for ensuring that: (a) security patches are applied within a reasonable time after they become available; (b) security patches are tested before being applied in production systems; (c) security patches come from trusted sources and are checked for integrity; (d) additional measures are implemented and residual risks are accepted in cases where a patch is not available or not applied pursuant to point 6.6.2.”Rings and the pilot: patches tested before production; windows timed so patches are applied within a reasonable time
DORA — Regulation (EU) 2022/2554Article 9(4)(e) — “implement documented policies, procedures and controls for ICT change management, including changes to software, hardware, firmware components, systems or security parameters, that are based on a risk assessment approach and are an integral part of the financial entity’s overall change management process, in order to ensure that all changes to ICT systems are recorded, tested, assessed, approved, implemented and verified in a controlled manner”Windows booked as pre-approved changes, with rollback criteria agreed before each deployment (financial entities)
DORA — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774Article 8(2)(c)(iii) — “ICT system restart, rollback, and recovery procedures for use in the event of ICT system disruption”Rollback sheet: restart and rollback steps agreed for each ring and group (financial entities)
DORA — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774Article 10(4) — the patch management procedures shall “(a) to the extent possible identify and evaluate available software and hardware patches and updates using automated tools; (b) identify emergency procedures for the patching and updating of ICT assets; (c) test and deploy the software and hardware patches and the updates referred to in Article 8(2), points (b)(v), (vi) and (vii); (d) set deadlines for the installation of software and hardware patches and updates and escalation procedures in case those deadlines cannot be met.”Calendar: patches tested and deployed on fixed dates, inside the deadlines the standard sets (financial entities)

Editions referenced: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 incl. Amd 1:2024; NIST CSF 2.0; Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690; Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774

ISO/IEC 27001 references name the clause or control this document relates to. They do not say that meeting it meets any other framework's requirement.

Prepared by Zero One Cybersecurity · Published by CISO Times

CISO Times Resource Licence — Internal Use