How do we…
How often do we review access, and who does the reviewing?
Add to board memoOpen the memo
The short answer
- Recommendation
- Set the frequency by what the access can do: privileged access every 3 months, systems supporting a critical service every 6, and all others every 12, in the pack's defaults. Give each entry to the reviewer who can judge it, and check nobody reviews their own access or their reviewer's.
- Reasoning
- Privileged access can do the most harm and changes most often, so it is reviewed most often, on every system. An ERP reviewed every 6 months still has its administrator accounts reviewed every 3. The line manager knows whether a person still needs the system; only the system owner can say whether the permissions fit the job. Information security reviews every privileged account a second time and samples every reviewer's decisions.
- Considerations
- The 3, 6 and 12 months are the pack's defaults, set to meet the regulated minimums it cites for critical or important functions under DORA and for cardholder data. Your own method may set shorter ones.
- If you cannot tell whether a role is privileged, or whether a system supports a critical service, take the shorter frequency until you know.
- In a small team where independence is impossible, record the conflict and have an external reviewer or internal audit check those entries.
- Run a review out of cycle after a restructure, a merger, an incident involving misuse of access, or a change of system owner.
The decision, step by step
Select any step for the reasoning behind it and where the pack covers it.
- Start
- Step
- Decision
- Outcome
Keyboard: Tab to a step, arrow keys move along the flow, Enter pins its explanation, + and − zoom, 0 fits the diagram, Esc closes. The text version below has the same content.
Where a step quotes a number, it is the default in the CISO Times pack. Your own standard may set a different one.
Read as text
The same flow written out: each step, its reasoning and where the pack covers it. 10 steps.
Start
Setting how often a system's access is reviewed, and by whom
Answer the frequency question separately for the administrator access and the ordinary access on the system. An ERP reviewed every 6 months still has its administrator accounts reviewed every 3. The frequency is set by what the access can do, not by how convenient the system is to review.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyFrequency (rule AR-02)
- P07-A04 Access Review Scope & System InventoryInstructions
Decision
Can this access change the system, its users or its security?
That is privileged or administrator access: administrator groups, super-user roles, database owners. It can do the most harm and changes most often. If you cannot tell whether a role carries administrator rights, treat it as privileged until the system owner says otherwise.
- Yes, or not known: Review it every 3 months
- No: Does the system support a critical service?
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyAccounts
Decision
Does the system support a critical service?
Include a critical or important function under DORA, and any system that stores, processes or transmits cardholder data. For these systems the six-monthly review is the regulated minimum the pack cites. If you do not yet know, take the shorter frequency.
- Yes, or not known: Review it every 6 months
- No: Review it every 12 months
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyFrequency
Step
Review it every 3 months
This applies to privileged and administrator access on every system, whatever the frequency for the rest of that system. A short list reviewed properly every quarter protects more than a long one reviewed carelessly once a year.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyFrequency
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyExample 2 — SYS-03, the directory administrator groups: privileged access
Step
Review it every 6 months
Frequencies run in calendar months from the extract date of the last campaign for that system. In a payment card environment, service and system accounts follow the frequency your targeted risk analysis sets; the pack's default is the frequency of the system they run on.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyFrequency
Step
Review it every 12 months
This covers every other in-scope system. Run a review out of cycle as well after a restructure, a merger, a security incident involving misuse of access, or a change of system owner.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyFrequency
- P07-A03 Access Review Campaign Operating ProcedureWhen this procedure runs
Step
Give each entry to the reviewer who can answer its question
The line manager decides whether each of their people still needs the system for their current job. The system owner decides whether the permissions fit that job, and reviews every privileged, generic, service and third-party account and every entry nobody else could decide. Information security reviews every privileged account a second time and samples every reviewer's decisions.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyWho reviews (rule AR-06)
- P07-A03 Access Review Campaign Operating ProcedureRoles
Decision
Would anyone review their own access, or their reviewer's?
Check every assignment. A line manager's own access goes to their own manager. An administrator does not review the group they belong to. The Head of Information Security's own access goes to another executive. If you cannot tell who reviews whom, check before the lists go out.
- Yes, or not known: Reassign those entries to someone independent
- No: Review at that frequency, with those reviewers
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyWho reviews (rule AR-04)
- P07-A05 Reviewer Instruction Pack & Campaign CommunicationsYou never review your own access
Step
Reassign those entries to someone independent
Where the system owner is in the group they review, their own membership goes to a named executive outside it. In a small team where independence is impossible, record the conflict and have an external reviewer or internal audit check those entries, as a compensating check.
In the pack
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyWho reviews
- P07-A03 Access Review Campaign Operating ProcedureRoles
Outcome
Review at that frequency, with those reviewers
Record the frequency and the reviewers in your own inventory of in-scope systems, and plan each campaign from the earliest due date. Changes to the frequencies are approved by whoever approves your access control rules; the pack's default is executive management.
In the pack
- P07-A04 Access Review Scope & System InventoryInventory
- P07-A04 Access Review Scope & System InventorySummary
- P07-A02 Access Review MethodologyReview
Practical checklist
- Set the frequency separately for the administrator access and the ordinary access on each system.
- Review privileged and administrator access every 3 months on every system.
- Review systems supporting a critical service every 6 months, and all other in-scope systems every 12.
- Count each frequency in calendar months from the extract date of the system's last campaign.
- Give personal accounts to line managers, and permissions and every privileged, generic, service and third-party account to the system owner.
- Send every privileged account to information security for a second review.
- Reassign any entry where someone would review their own access or their reviewer's.
- Record the frequency and reviewers in your inventory of in-scope systems, and plan from the earliest due date.
Evidence to have ready
- The inventory of in-scope systems, with each one's owner, scope, frequency and last review date.
- The reviewer assignments for each campaign, and how each conflict of independence was handled.
- Your approved review method, including its frequencies and who approves changes to them.
Assumptions
- The system is already in scope for review. Deciding that is “How do we decide which systems belong in the review?”.
- The frequencies shown are the defaults in the CISO Times access review pack. They meet the regulated minimums the pack cites. Your own method may set shorter ones.
Not covered here
- Which systems belong in the review. That is “How do we decide which systems belong in the review?”.
- How the privileged review itself runs. That is “How do we review privileged and administrator access?”.
- How to stop reviewers approving everything. That is “How do we run an access review that isn't rubber-stamped?”.